| Doc_id | Review | Left | Term | Right | Sentiment | Polarity | Rating |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Some of the interesting topics discussed in this course could be treated substantially more extensive and detailed in order to get a better grip and understanding on them (e.g. Gibbs sampling). After this course, it is a bit dazzling how much different algorithms and methods are available for clustering and retrieval tasks and this course easily could have been subdivided into two or three separate courses on the same topic with a more detailed treatment. Still, about many interesting subjects a tip of the iceberg has been brought to you ... it tastes so good that you would like to have much more! | dazzling how much different algorithms and | Method | are available for clustering and retrieval | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course nice practical approach. I was kind of surprised that hierarchical clustering was kept at the end and discussed only marginally since it is a widely used approach. I liked the part about LDA but IMHO I would have liked more discussion about fundamental techniques rather than such an advanced method. Too focus on text data. Most of the application I worked on have limited textual data. | techniques rather than such an advanced | Method | Too focus on text data. Most | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | This is a great intro class, designed to be completed within the Ableton trial period. Ableton should pay Erin a commission on sales that come out of this course, because I imagine it's bringing them 100s of new sales! The materials (mostly videos) are excellent and easy to follow. I learned a lot in this short class and would love to see an "intermediate" Ableton class in the future. My only complaints are related to the collaboration software that you need to use for this course, blend.io. Site navigation in blend.io can be painfully slow, and the site is buggy. I would have preferred to simply share information via dropbox or some other file sharing method. The peer review process is a great idea, although I think it's really tricky to do this in a music/art, because there is so much subjectivity and not much of a rubric. (There are some quantitative questions just to verify that the student follows instructions, but the open feedback is totally open). But, overall, the peer review works pretty well and gives students an additional incentive to turn in a quality product. | dropbox or some other file sharing | Method | The peer review process is a | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | This course is a great opportunity to start in development area, adding concepts and terminologies that are used in routine work of a programmer. The methods, concepts and analogies are simple and useful. Congratulations to the tutors. | routine work of a programmer. The | Method | concepts and analogies are simple and | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Interesting method for teaching programming. Very basic. Very visual. It was worth my time. | Interesting | Method | for teaching programming. Very basic. Very | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Excellent methodology and content to learn concepts of software engineering and how to program! Recommended to all who want initiating in programming and even to those who already build their own programs! | Excellent | Method | and content to learn concepts of | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | This was truly and excellent introduction to systems engineering. The facilitators presented the course content in the simplest methodology, utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The exercises and extended-exercises gave an opportunity to apply the knowledge acquired to verify and validate complete understanding and application of the course materials. | the course content in the simplest | Method | utilizing diagrams to aid comprehension. The | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | It is not easy to teach a methodology, knowing that the students come from very different backgrounds and system domains. The instructors were able to teach the concepts with the right pace and to provide examples which were easy to follow. In my opinion, a key success criterion for the course is the chosen running example: a dwelling. Every student, independent from background and system domain, can relate to it and apply the methodology. Because of the dwelling example, students could review the work of other students and don't get confused by a system domain they don't understand. It is worthwhile to mention that the course material is based on ISO 15288 and ISO 29148. I can highly recommend the course as an introduction to Systems Engineering. | is not easy to teach a | Method | knowing that the students come from | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | It is not easy to teach a methodology, knowing that the students come from very different backgrounds and system domains. The instructors were able to teach the concepts with the right pace and to provide examples which were easy to follow. In my opinion, a key success criterion for the course is the chosen running example: a dwelling. Every student, independent from background and system domain, can relate to it and apply the methodology. Because of the dwelling example, students could review the work of other students and don't get confused by a system domain they don't understand. It is worthwhile to mention that the course material is based on ISO 15288 and ISO 29148. I can highly recommend the course as an introduction to Systems Engineering. | relate to it and apply the | Method | Because of the dwelling example, students | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | its good to learn this subject free of cost and amazing teaching method. | free of cost and amazing teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | This is not an Introduction but a Review of Machine Learning methods used in Yandex. Probably, you have to multiply estimated required time by 10 to really understand lecture topics. Kaggle competition at the end makes the course really interesting. but: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." -- Ernest Rutherford | but a Review of Machine Learning | Method | used in Yandex. Probably, you have | Negative | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Really liked the examples you gave! Great teaching method! | the examples you gave! Great teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | very practical and brief to understand the whole method about finance | and brief to understand the whole | Method | about finance | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A very basic, however, very important topics were covered for Non-Financials Pros. Great teaching method! | covered for Non-Financials Pros. Great teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good basic overview of financial practices and methods. | basic overview of financial practices and | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Please include exercises for computing the ratios and the valuation methods. In-video questions would have helped more. The quiz does not actually test the understanding of the topic in-depth. There can be some external readings suggested - resources that help us get more understanding on the subjects discussed. | computing the ratios and the valuation | Method | In-video questions would have helped more. | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | I find this course excellent. It is a well balanced course in combining econometric theory and its application. The fact is that to apply econometric theory one needs to understand fair bit of econometric method (that includes matrix algebra, some properties of inner product space etc.) as well as how to apply those concepts in practice. In this respect this course does serve its purpose very well. Overall, this course focuses some fundamental aspects and properties of cross-sectional data and time series data. Therefore, it provides one a good foundation (over 8 weeks) so that one can carry out one's future quest regarding any empirical topic by oneself ! I admit that modern econometric theory develops more sophisticated techniques but all of them share one common aspect i.e. they are based on more or less the same fundamentals or properties. Indeed, this course has been designed carefully by targeting those fundamentals and properties. Thus it might be very helpful to follow the modern econometric techniques. However, this course does not talk about the panel data analysis, which share both the cross-sectional and time series properties (more or less). In my opinion it might be better to have at least additional one week session on panel data. In particular, when the data set shares both cross-sectional and time series properties, which set of properties will be dominant or how the estimation technique incorporates the variation of two dimensions (i.e. cross-sectional and time ) etc. Finally, I like to thank all the teaching members and moderators of this course. I have enjoyed the lecture slides and videos very much. | to understand fair bit of econometric | Method | (that includes matrix algebra, some properties | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 1ll5BIJbEeSkLyIAC1OGNA | It's great course to understand what and how to give. The quest speakers gave lots of stories to student for "case study". And the assessment methodology of evaluating a nonprofit is quite useful and easy to participate. The assighment of assesement a nonprofit takes a while to think about and finish, but it was a good one to "train" our brain how to define a problem and how to get useful recourses to resolve them. | case study" . And the assessment | Method | of evaluating a nonprofit is quite | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked. these methods really drives into good time management | I liked. these | Method | really drives into good time management | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Coursera stands for its rich courses. This one is an exception, one of the worst I've ever seen so far. It's like reading a bad inspirational book. No system, no methods in place. | bad inspirational book. No system, no | Method | in place. | Negative | 0.65 | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I use taught methods and could manage time more efficiently. | I use taught | Method | and could manage time more efficiently. | Negative | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | simple and useful tips. the lecturer introduced importance and method for time log, prioritization, dealing with different tasks (do immediately, archive, do later, wait for other information), keeping only 1 calendar, etc. also, she introduced the "switching cost" concept and way to decrease it (taking notes before switching task), which is very useful | tips. the lecturer introduced importance and | Method | for time log, prioritization, dealing with | Positive | 0.91 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I think the best quality of this course is that it is a short course, which bolds the most important facts in our mind. It is not like that we don't know them at all, It's just we don't pay much or enough attention. I start using this method from today and I hope it goes well ! You should try this course, I think it worth it ! | enough attention. I start using this | Method | from today and I hope it | Positive | 0.95 | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | very helpful with the online tools that can help with e-learning and enhance instructional methods | help with e-learning and enhance instructional | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | IT was quite helpful. Simple methods that make a lot of difference in your work and personal life were explained. I really enjoyed it. Thanks. | IT was quite helpful. Simple | Method | that make a lot of difference | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course provide many useful methods to make you aware of your time, after that you can use your time more effectively. | This course provide many useful | Method | to make you aware of your | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Simple and practical guidelines which can be followed easily. I think I will be able to apply the methods discussed in the course on daily basis without actually spending much time on learning them as they are very practical! The course has been useful in making me realize where all my time has been going without quantifiable results and hopefully I will be able to make a habit of good time management. Thank you for putting it together :-) | will be able to apply the | Method | discussed in the course on daily | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | So far, I like this course the most. It covers very practical and useful methods which I can apply immediately at work place. | It covers very practical and useful | Method | which I can apply immediately at | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Great course. I am a begainer, I learned how to start with R. I also acquired knowledge of probability. Course methodology is great, you get to learn and apply the concepts. | also acquired knowledge of probability. Course | Method | is great, you get to learn | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | I took this course hoping for a fundamental education in utilizing R for statistical analysis. Unfortunately, this course focuses heavily on statistical methods and very little on explaining the R processes used. Good for introductory stats students, not great for those interested in furthering their knowledge of R. | this course focuses heavily on statistical | Method | and very little on explaining the | Positive | 0.81 | 3.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Awesome, I really love how it started and went to the final with ease with many topics covered. Unity is a great tool, and the teacher has a great method of speaking. The projects assigned to these cover the basics for making great games, from design to script. Can't wait to continue the legacy of game making courses. Thanks Coursera! | and the teacher has a great | Method | of speaking. The projects assigned to | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent hands-on introduction to the Unity game engine, the development workflow and the many nuances of how these all work together for the artistic as well as the technical designers. I especially appreciate the instructor's careful attention to learner-centered demonstration, and for his respectful use of, as well as frequent nods to, Unity as a top notch engine for quality development. Packed with a great deal of information, and the demonstration of how to apply this knowledge, I would highly recommend this course to anyone who is wanting to break into interactive media development, or is wanting to broaden their methods and application knowledge in this area. | or is wanting to broaden their | Method | and application knowledge in this area. | Negative | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really enjoyed the fast paced teaching methods and the hand on training :) | Really enjoyed the fast paced teaching | Method | and the hand on training :) | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great Course!! Excellent teacher and methods, with very pleasant projects =) | Great Course! ! Excellent teacher and | Method | with very pleasant projects =) | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Exceptional introductory course. Lessons were well organized, different methods were used to perform the same function to show flexibility, simply a pure joy to take! | course. Lessons were well organized, different | Method | were used to perform the same | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | The course is teached with good humor and an easy to understand method. Congratulation Dr. Chuck. | humor and an easy to understand | Method | Congratulation Dr. Chuck. | Positive | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I enjoyed the course. This course took me waaaay more time than I thought because I struggled with a few issues. First, I wish I'd started by taking the NLP online course before starting the Capstone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aMYz1tMfPg). There was an issue installing RWeka, RJava and it took me several days to work through the issues. I eventually moved to using quanteda (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/quanteda/vignettes/quickstart.html). I also waited far too long to develop a method to test my model using a subset of the training data, so I could test whether changes to my model improved and reduced performance. It turns out that my model trained on a 25% sample performed just as well as a model trained on 100%. I'm thankful for the Discussion Forum and final peer review process. Both helped me learn how I can improve my model and demo application. I really appreciate the instructors for creating this specialization. I've learned a lot. | far too long to develop a | Method | to test my model using a | Negative | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This course is a delight. Method of instruction involves a lot of conversation style and group discussion type channels, along with the traditional lectures, and its well thought out, well assembled, well delivered without being very heavy to absorb. Thanks for putting this together. | This course is a delight. | Method | of instruction involves a lot of | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This Machine Learning class and the rest of the Machine Learning series from the University of Washington is the best material on the subject matter. What really sets this course and series apart is the case-base methodology as well as in-depth technical subject matter. Specifically, the step through coding of the algorithms provides key insight that is seriously missed in other classes even in traditional academic settings. I highly encourage the authors and other Coursera publishers to continue to publish more educational material in the same framework. | and series apart is the case-base | Method | as well as in-depth technical subject | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very focused overview of different classification methods. Goes deeper than in other ML classes. | Very focused overview of different classification | Method | Goes deeper than in other ML | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Highly recommended course, looking under the hood to examine how popular ML algorithms like decision trees and boosting are actually implemented. I'm surprised at how intuitive the idea of boosting really is. Also interesting that random forests are dismissed as not as powerful as boosting, but I would love to know why! Both methods appear to expose more data to the learner, and a heuristic comparison between RF and boosting would have been greatly appreciated. One can immediately notice the difference between statistician Emily, who took us through the mathematical derivation of the derivative (ha.ha.) function for linear regression (much appreciated Emily!), and computer scientist Carlos, who skipped this bit for logistic regression but provided lots of verbose code to track the running of algorithms during assignments (helps to see what is actually happening under the hood). Excellent lecturers both, thank you! | would love to know why! Both | Method | appear to expose more data to | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Really liked the practical application of this course - very useful in learning classification methods. | - very useful in learning classification | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course provides an overview on classification methods in machine learning. The lectures are clear and easy to understand due to the quality of the slides and of the explanations. The limit of this course lies in the assignments: too easy if done with the provided notebooks and tools. Sometimes impossible to do with different tools (the suggested machine learning package is free for educational purposes, but otherwise it needs a license). | course provides an overview on classification | Method | in machine learning. The lectures are | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I come to know how can i applym machine learning conceps i real world scenarios . The instructors are so nice and always explaining in simple methods. Nice teaching abilities.. Glad to guided under this kind of instructors. Nice experience. | nice and always explaining in simple | Method | Nice teaching abilities. . Glad to | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 3cmY9AVPEeWr2CIAC20DIw | Excellent course, highly recommended if you are interested in supporting or giving to charities, getting to know how you can effectively donate and where your money is being invested properly and it's effectiveness. Gives great insight on what types of advocative work is being done, evaluation methods, criteria and what people should support. Very clear information on how to lead a better life and a more meaningful, helpful, altruistic life. | advocative work is being done, evaluation | Method | criteria and what people should support. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | I have been teaching myself (attempting to) Korean via various methods over the past 9 months, but I really enjoyed the structure of this class. It helped me understand WHY sentences/words are structured as they are, instead of just memorizing a lot of vocabulary and cramming too much information in my head at once. Can't wait for more from Yonsei University! | myself (attempting to) Korean via various | Method | over the past 9 months, but | Positive | 0.83 | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very intuitive Beginning Korean Course. The method of teaching was clear and detail. I just wish there would be more exercise for student to practice to get used to the Korean alphabet/vocabulary. Overall outstanding course. | Very intuitive Beginning Korean Course. The | Method | of teaching was clear and detail. | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It's easy for a beginning learner,the teacher taught the structure and the framework that Korean are formed.It seems that we can use the method that we learn English to learn Korean.It's an interesting course. | seems that we can use the | Method | that we learn English to learn | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is a very good course for everyone to learn basic of Korean. For me who have learned Korean by read Korean lesson book somehow this course not give much thing to learn. GRAMMAR (5/5) This course is good because it give me more insight about Korean grammar (difference between normal. formal, and informal speech; the using of 예요/ 이에요, 이/가, etc). THE TEACHER (5/5) She explain clearly and give some exercise in the video to make us practice. I like the method. VOCABULARY (3/5) There were not much vocabulary in the course. I hope Yonsei University would add more new vocabulary in the course. TEST/ ASSIGNMENT (3/5) I've taken another language online course at another site that similar to Coursera. That site's assignments more complex than this course's given. This site only test our reading and listening but there were not speaking aspect that scored here. And I wish you will add writing aspect to the course. LESSON (3/5) The lessons those given here really simple. They were easy to understand, but I hope there will be a sequel of this course that will give us more advance lessons. Recommendation: - add more vocabulary, - add speaking and writing assignment, - a sequel of this course. Thank you for coursera and Yonsei University for giving me an opportunity to learn Korean Language for free. | make us practice. I like the | Method | VOCABULARY (3/5) There were not much | Negative | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This "Craft of Plot" class--taught by Mr. Skyhorse--covers the ABDCE method, the 21 point checklist, etc. Stories written in this class must have dialogue, at least ten points of rising action, and must begin with an action sequence. No, this is not an "organic" story writing method. This class teaches students how to use formulaic writing to artificially engineer stories efficiently and effectively. I was very disappointed with this class. I enjoy reading literary fiction, especially stories in The New Yorker. So it is no surprise that I was appalled by Mr. Skyhorse's strong focus on, and praise of, the Harry Potter book series. If you plan on writing formulaic genre fiction, then perhaps this class is for you. Even though I disliked the class, I must admit it was well taught, hence the 4/5 star review. | class--taught by Mr. Skyhorse--covers the ABDCE | Method | the 21 point checklist, etc. Stories | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This "Craft of Plot" class--taught by Mr. Skyhorse--covers the ABDCE method, the 21 point checklist, etc. Stories written in this class must have dialogue, at least ten points of rising action, and must begin with an action sequence. No, this is not an "organic" story writing method. This class teaches students how to use formulaic writing to artificially engineer stories efficiently and effectively. I was very disappointed with this class. I enjoy reading literary fiction, especially stories in The New Yorker. So it is no surprise that I was appalled by Mr. Skyhorse's strong focus on, and praise of, the Harry Potter book series. If you plan on writing formulaic genre fiction, then perhaps this class is for you. Even though I disliked the class, I must admit it was well taught, hence the 4/5 star review. | not an " organic" story writing | Method | This class teaches students how to | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Course is a little formulaic, had trouble making my submissions follow the structure outlined but still, I learnt some useful tips and actually got to just write something orderly. Liked some of the visiting speakers (the third speaker who talked about character - mature lady, dark hair) was quite good. So was the first gentleman. Overall, the course is ok but given the strict methodology and requirements for writing, I don't know if I'll make it through the specialisation. Thank you for reading! | is ok but given the strict | Method | and requirements for writing, I don't | Negative | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The new platform is very versatile and easy to navigate. The page layout is much more clear. It is easy to navigate from course material to discussion boards. I like the Quiz format, including expanding the number of choices for the multiple choice selections, but the grading was confusing. For Quiz 3, some questions came back with multiple "Well Done" comments, even when I had not selected the answer for which I was being praised. I also was told I made errors on the same question.... and this was after I answered the question (Question 2, on R generic functions) the exact same as I had answered it when I took the course earlier this year. I was not a fan of not having to take a picture to submit work, so I am pleased that is no longer a requirement. I hope the typing pattern match is sufficient to affirm identity. I have one comment on content specific to this class. Week 3 content lacks relevancy to the project and data products in general. I agree that knowledge of R packages, classes, and methods is an important part of understanding R. I am not sure where that fits in the Data Science curriculum as a whole, though. Maybe expanding the curriculum to include a second, more advanced R class, with a project to write our own methods, build an R package, or do something with yhat. That would assign relevant work to reinforce the lectures. I would be happy to do further beta testing. DCP | knowledge of R packages, classes, and | Method | is an important part of understanding | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | The new platform is very versatile and easy to navigate. The page layout is much more clear. It is easy to navigate from course material to discussion boards. I like the Quiz format, including expanding the number of choices for the multiple choice selections, but the grading was confusing. For Quiz 3, some questions came back with multiple "Well Done" comments, even when I had not selected the answer for which I was being praised. I also was told I made errors on the same question.... and this was after I answered the question (Question 2, on R generic functions) the exact same as I had answered it when I took the course earlier this year. I was not a fan of not having to take a picture to submit work, so I am pleased that is no longer a requirement. I hope the typing pattern match is sufficient to affirm identity. I have one comment on content specific to this class. Week 3 content lacks relevancy to the project and data products in general. I agree that knowledge of R packages, classes, and methods is an important part of understanding R. I am not sure where that fits in the Data Science curriculum as a whole, though. Maybe expanding the curriculum to include a second, more advanced R class, with a project to write our own methods, build an R package, or do something with yhat. That would assign relevant work to reinforce the lectures. I would be happy to do further beta testing. DCP | a project to write our own | Method | build an R package, or do | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course overall provided me with useful ideas and methods for understanding my organization better and the psychology of the workplace. What drives individuals in an organization is a question that permeates the course, and ... how can leaders tap into common organizational behaviors to improve their management? Some of the examples are a bit tired if you've taken just about any psychology course, but the kernels of advice are worth the time if you want to understand your workplace better. | provided me with useful ideas and | Method | for understanding my organization better and | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a lot better than trying to learn the methods and information on my own without an instructor. I feel very empowered. In any case, the course was a very good brain workout. | better than trying to learn the | Method | and information on my own without | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | If you are interested in having a deeper insight of the 3D printing technology, I recommend this course. There are no prerequisites, all you need is the desire to learn. This course will introduce to to you the different 3D manufacturing methods, and present to you to 3D printing companies that are presently actively. If you want to transitions into the 3D printing field, I believe this course is a good start. | to you the different 3D manufacturing | Method | and present to you to 3D | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | The course material is invaluably helpful for anyone looking for a new approach to innovation and provides learners with a "method" or path for what often appears as magic or intuition. Assignments are a little bit too easy to complete imo and could be made harder to deepen our understanding and make information stick for the long run. | and provides learners with a " | Method | or path for what often appears | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | This course has given me really valuable methodology to thing about new processes, how it is important for users and for the company overall. | course has given me really valuable | Method | to thing about new processes, how | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Excellent introduction to Agile methods focusing on really understanding the customer through personas and problem statements. | Excellent introduction to Agile | Method | focusing on really understanding the customer | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | It would be nice with more than [Ted the HVAC tech] to clear things up, he is hard to relate to if you have another kind of software you want to develop. Othervise i really like the methods and the videos, the teacher is easy to understand, he has good points and is good at explaning his material. | develop. Othervise i really like the | Method | and the videos, the teacher is | Positive | 0.77 | 4.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good course. Introduce you to agile methodology, and show how to do first steps in agile development. Also the is excellent, interesting assignment project | Good course. Introduce you to agile | Method | and show how to do first | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent, content, explanations and methods, highly recomend it | Excellent, content, explanations and | Method | highly recomend it | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Thanks to this course, i am now understanding the principle and methodology of phylogenetics | am now understanding the principle and | Method | of phylogenetics | Negative | 0.85 | 3.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Very usefull!! Who want to learn the basic methods of bioinfo i recomend this course! | Who want to learn the basic | Method | of bioinfo i recomend this course! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Great and indepth introduction for those interested in learning bioinformatics. Next stop: Bioinformatic Methods II | in learning bioinformatics. Next stop: Bioinformatic | Method | II | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | It is really useful and informative course to learn the basis of bioinformatic methods. | to learn the basis of bioinformatic | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | A good, interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic methods. Professor Provart is able to make thing easy, whilst showing you how to exploit data and tools freely - well ... usually, they are for free - available on the Internet. I suggest this course to everyone approaching the topic. Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic Method II to be initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic methods. The 5th star is missing because I would like to have some more insights about some underlying "reasons why". But, I reckon this as my own peculiarity. Good job, Professor Provart! And thank you very much for this! | interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic | Method | Professor Provart is able to make | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | A good, interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic methods. Professor Provart is able to make thing easy, whilst showing you how to exploit data and tools freely - well ... usually, they are for free - available on the Internet. I suggest this course to everyone approaching the topic. Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic Method II to be initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic methods. The 5th star is missing because I would like to have some more insights about some underlying "reasons why". But, I reckon this as my own peculiarity. Good job, Professor Provart! And thank you very much for this! | Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic | Method | II to be initiated to elements | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | A good, interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic methods. Professor Provart is able to make thing easy, whilst showing you how to exploit data and tools freely - well ... usually, they are for free - available on the Internet. I suggest this course to everyone approaching the topic. Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic Method II to be initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic methods. The 5th star is missing because I would like to have some more insights about some underlying "reasons why". But, I reckon this as my own peculiarity. Good job, Professor Provart! And thank you very much for this! | initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic | Method | The 5th star is missing because | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course structure is okay and availability of course material e-book is big plus for the course. However there are negatives also. This is a course on "Digital Marketing" and it has to be taken to great heights in terms of content and delivery. Most critical issue is delivery. The most happening and lively subject like this needs a delivery in a exalted method. Though reference material is good collection but there is total disconnect between video lectures and those reference material at many instances. Revamp all video series. Add more case studies videos. | needs a delivery in a exalted | Method | Though reference material is good collection | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | A great overview of text retrieval methods. Good coverage of search engines. A longer course will cover search engine better (remember this is a 6 weeker) | A great overview of text retrieval | Method | Good coverage of search engines. A | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | To my mind, this course is the perfect way to begin to understand Game Design. The learning-by-doing method is very efficient! | to understand Game Design. The learning-by-doing | Method | is very efficient! | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course focuses on how to build and expand the rules of games in artful, technical, and interesting ways. This course focuses on the central part of the modern game - the gameplay itself. The instructor is very capable with his words and concisely explains the topic in a way that is easy to understand while also being abnormally interesting. His instruction methods are atypical, in that he uses a puppet to create the illusion of dialogue between him and his audience. This may sound strange, but it is very effective. | also being abnormally interesting. His instruction | Method | are atypical, in that he uses | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great content, nice way to get a basic notion of what it takes to creat a game, nice classes and method of learning, | creat a game, nice classes and | Method | of learning, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Simple and fun method of education. short length videos, kind instructor and fun assignments. i have learned some basics in game world. i like this course and thanks to coursera,calARTS,Fran and his cool puppet friend :) | Simple and fun | Method | of education. short length videos, kind | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | 5/5 if there were more pictures and diagrams of the methods while they were talking to better visualize. | more pictures and diagrams of the | Method | while they were talking to better | Negative | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Nice overview of different practices and methods. | Nice overview of different practices and | Method | | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | very bad, useless course. Just listing the names of the methods and practices. | Just listing the names of the | Method | and practices. | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Nice introduction to Agile and Lean methodology, should probably cover more about Lean | Nice introduction to Agile and Lean | Method | should probably cover more about Lean | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Excellent demonstration with the easiest method. | Excellent demonstration with the easiest | Method | | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This course is jam packed full of helpful information. I like how the instructor sits and looks at us (the leaner) and talks. It helps feeling relaxed while learning. I feel I have learned more with this method. | I have learned more with this | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I wanted this course to focus specifically on strategies for engaging young readers, but it did not. Additionally, the method of assignment sharing is a file upload/download dropbox. I had fully intended to participate until I saw that. As a MOOC, I realize that there could be any number of individuals registering for this course using false information and uploading nefarious scripts that could hijack my computer should I download something from here. No thanks, Coursera. Epic fail. | but it did not. Additionally, the | Method | of assignment sharing is a file | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Method of delivery was excellent! | | Method | of delivery was excellent! | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course was really great only because of my mentor and his teaching methods I loved learning for the first time in my life. | of my mentor and his teaching | Method | I loved learning for the first | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Best method to teach programming. I loved it!!!! You made me love programming... Thank you very much...please do continue your great work in future. | Best | Method | to teach programming. I loved it! | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is amazing for people with no prior background. The teaching methodology, the structure and the professor rare just too amazing. | with no prior background. The teaching | Method | the structure and the professor rare | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is my first course in Coursera, it's so excellent a trip. The content is so friendly for the beginners to start with and the logic in teaching methods are nice, too. Hope someday I can continue my further study with again. Thanks a lot. | with and the logic in teaching | Method | are nice, too. Hope someday I | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I have tried to take a few of the free online courses in Python and none compare to the teaching methods of this course. It moves so eloquently that anyone can learn Python through this course, even me. It does not jump to long confusing lines of code or randomly introduce functions/features not discussed. Rather, it sticks to small lines of code to get the point across until you are comfortable with it. the tools achieved in this course are valuable for anyone in any field needed to analyze and/or manipulate data. I have recommended this course to friends and family attempting to learn. Thank you so much Dr. Severance! Note - If you are already familiar with Python this course would not be worth while; it is a beginner course. | and none compare to the teaching | Method | of this course. It moves so | Negative | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great course to start learning the methods of computer programming and also a perfect platform to revise and re-memorize programming logic and skills. Thank you Dr Chuck for such wonderful presentation and making python learning such a fun. The motivational talks by some of the pioneers in modern day production indulged me to think different and move forward in life. | great course to start learning the | Method | of computer programming and also a | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really enjoyed the classes and Professor Chuck teaching method is fun as well as efficient! | the classes and Professor Chuck teaching | Method | is fun as well as efficient! | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the greatest teachings by a professor. Good method of teaching and thus my way of learning has been differed from the orthodox classroom learning. Thank You Coursera! i'm enjoying the video learning and I'm keen to learn other courses from this very organization. | greatest teachings by a professor. Good | Method | of teaching and thus my way | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I think sometimes it got very confusing some of the examples being the exact same from chapter to chapter. It was nice having a ground for it but i started to question why would you use this method instead of the one we used before for hours and rate specifically. | question why would you use this | Method | instead of the one we used | Negative | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginner. Prof teaches very elegantly and the concepts are brought about with clarity and easy to understand method. I simply love the course and professor's teaching style. | with clarity and easy to understand | Method | I simply love the course and | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Method of teaching is very well! | | Method | of teaching is very well! | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severance is great. He introduces you to coding in a way that is non-intimidating and feels completely natural within a couple of weeks. Instead of dreading class I found myself excited about attending everyday and was able to progress faster than the course outline due to his extremely clear and supportive teaching method. I'm already reading data from files and it isn't even covered until the next course. If you take this class, read the book and you will do well. | his extremely clear and supportive teaching | Method | I'm already reading data from files | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very excellent, and it gives you the basic knowledge of computers not only the methods to program. Moreover, it is also suitable for the newcomer. | knowledge of computers not only the | Method | to program. Moreover, it is also | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent method of teaching and course structure. | Excellent | Method | of teaching and course structure. | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excelent course! Excelent professor, great pedagogical methods used, a very accesible language and very good quality information. And the book is awesome! Thanks for uploading it. | Excelent course! Excelent professor, great pedagogical | Method | used, a very accesible language and | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent for a beginner!! Professor Severance follows a very smooth and efficient method of teaching that reduces anxiety and increases passion for learning!! Recommended to anyone starting Python!!! | follows a very smooth and efficient | Method | of teaching that reduces anxiety and | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am halfway through the course and I am really enjoying it. The teacher is great and uses effective methods to explain things! | teacher is great and uses effective | Method | to explain things! | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The method of teaching, quizzes and assignments helped me to learn as much as possible from this course. Thankyou for providing this course! | The | Method | of teaching, quizzes and assignments helped | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Charles Severence is amazing at what he does, his method of teaching is second to none. you remind me of my physics teacher back at high school he was very unorthodox in his teaching also. so glad to see the course has gone to include all the material from his phenomenal book. Thank you and well done snape youre awesome | amazing at what he does, his | Method | of teaching is second to none. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Overall the course was fantastic. Teaching was spot on and the methods was brilliant. I only have one issue with this course and that's how it uses an auto grader. In my opinion they aren't that great because it only checks for valid input/outputs and not that you understand what it is you're doing. Other courses I've done expect work to be submitted and peer assessed so you can see how other people reach their answers and learn more from that experience. That said though anyone looking to get into computing I would recommend doing this course. | Teaching was spot on and the | Method | was brilliant. I only have one | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Exceptional teaching skills and very good dynamics. Incridable course methodology, I recommend. | and very good dynamics. Incridable course | Method | I recommend. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent Courser with great teaching methods..!! | Excellent Courser with great teaching | Method | . ! ! | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severance is a great professor. The method he uses to introduce Python is great for someone who has no prior coding experience. He keeps in interesting and provides a strong foundation to learn more of Python and other computer languages. I would highly recommend this class as a starting point if you want to learn programming. | Severance is a great professor. The | Method | he uses to introduce Python is | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | time. Good exercises to practice. The | Method | of teaching is encouraging and not | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | i am really in love by the way they teach the method for teaching is so perfect by taking quiz ,assinments and all that helps students to know about himself/herself. and the bonus videos of interviews of great founders and CEO's inspire students to do something more creative for the next time and most important student's saturated notes. they helped you out to clear your concepts more precise so my advice to all newcomers is to take a brief look on notes. and also Dr. Charles Severance and his team deserves a hats-off for his hard-work. love this course....thanks | by the way they teach the | Method | for teaching is so perfect by | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good learning methods | good learning | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a great course. I love the step by step teaching method and detailed explanation. Despite the step by step method, the lecturer never fails to bores us because he always gets right to the point. | love the step by step teaching | Method | and detailed explanation. Despite the step | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a great course. I love the step by step teaching method and detailed explanation. Despite the step by step method, the lecturer never fails to bores us because he always gets right to the point. | explanation. Despite the step by step | Method | the lecturer never fails to bores | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well designed. The easy does it approach is very effective to focus on how the language works. With this method it is easier to learn Python than Ruby. I recommend it. | how the language works. With this | Method | it is easier to learn Python | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The teaching methodology was superb!! It worth spending time in his lecture.Hope to have some advance study soon in Python which shall be freely available to learners who keen to learn something new but cannot afford the tuition fee. . | The teaching | Method | was superb! ! It worth spending | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome teaching method, very complete course with lots of hands-on assignements and examples. | Awesome teaching | Method | very complete course with lots of | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really liked the way Mr. Severance approaches the problem and his methods of teaching. He is by far the goofiest teacher on coursera which is unique in a way and also desirable I think. He makes learning fun. Great Job. All the best for future courses. Will surely want to take another course on python taught by Mr. Severance. :) | Severance approaches the problem and his | Method | of teaching. He is by far | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | This is an excellent introduction to the world of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. I enjoyed the detailed information on every step of this research methodology. | on every step of this research | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 7mVd2Bh8EeWiMA6gO89JYQ | I really enjoy this course. It is informative, effective and assertive. The Group of Professors were committed for it in advance. You can tell based on the planning and methods. Two thumbs up! Realmente disfruto el curso, es informativo, efectivo y asertivo. El Profesorado se comprometió con las metas con anticipación. Se nota la planeación y los métodos. Bravo! | tell based on the planning and | Method | Two thumbs up! Realmente disfruto el | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Excellent Course! Learning Java, Android and also to think differently, will open your mind to think of different methods to implement and create applications. | your mind to think of different | Method | to implement and create applications. | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Excellent overview of the Human Microbiome. Covers DNA sequencing techniques and culturing methods practiced in the Knight Lab at the University of Colorado at Boulder for many types of microbes associated with humans. | Covers DNA sequencing techniques and culturing | Method | practiced in the Knight Lab at | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| 94jQ-3EnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Awesome course, excellent balance between theoretical & methodos + testimonial from professionals. Maybe a little bit more real-life example of successful products developed with the agile method would have been great | successful products developed with the agile | Method | would have been great | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| 94jQ-3EnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I gave the first course a very bad review and the second course an ok review. Now I am very impressed about how they are constantly working to improve all aspects of the course. For example: Now you can download the assignments on word (before you had to copy item by item from a pdf) and the test are not so ambiguous as they used to be. I remember, in the past, to continuously have the feeling that questions in test were too open to interpretation and that the right answer will be defined by some random detail, now they are definitely more straight forward. I also happened to have to log-in in the Online University where I got my Master's Degree years ago and saw their interface is still the same 0 user friendly and a very bad feeling of impossible communication so it really helped me appreciate the effort in improving the course. I really appreciate how they are willing to apply agile methodology to the course and with each iteration they make it better! | they are willing to apply agile | Method | to the course and with each | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Excellent scaffolding of exercises to provide a broad intro aspects of character development. Enjoyable, meaningful, and great teaching methodology! | development. Enjoyable, meaningful, and great teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The course focuses on a number of critical aspects in video game world design, such as artistic direction, spatial and "physical" rules, and movement considerations; and it teaches a few methods of planning them. That said, the presentation of these ideas and methods feels less organized than the others in the course. That said, all of them are useful, and if the exercises/submissions don't quite lead up to as organic a whole as the others, it makes up for it by covering bases with varied approaches. | considerations; and it teaches a few | Method | of planning them. That said, the | Positive | 0.65 | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The course focuses on a number of critical aspects in video game world design, such as artistic direction, spatial and "physical" rules, and movement considerations; and it teaches a few methods of planning them. That said, the presentation of these ideas and methods feels less organized than the others in the course. That said, all of them are useful, and if the exercises/submissions don't quite lead up to as organic a whole as the others, it makes up for it by covering bases with varied approaches. | the presentation of these ideas and | Method | feels less organized than the others | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The teacher is a litlle abstract. Maybe he would improve himself if he would give more tangible things, as methods. | would give more tangible things, as | Method | | Positive | 0.83 | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The course is fun but the content is too general. I like to know more methods and technics to develop a game world, considering genres, mechanics and gameplay options. | general. I like to know more | Method | and technics to develop a game | Positive | 0.88 | 3.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | This course is a great source of information for those who are being inserted into the Corporate Finance Marketing. Prof. Javier Estrada has the brilliant method to explain all tough issues that compoud Corporate Finance. I truly reccomend you to check this course out and collect the maximum information you can. It all will worth it! | Prof. Javier Estrada has the brilliant | Method | to explain all tough issues that | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A highly informative module giving you an overview of the scientific methods used in studying terrorism and counterterrorism. | you an overview of the scientific | Method | used in studying terrorism and counterterrorism. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It was a great course, i learned the mean aspects about terrorism and counter terrorism. I think the methodology used was essential to have more interest on the topics handled. I recommend it! | and counter terrorism. I think the | Method | used was essential to have more | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent explainations, graphics and methodology to learn | Excellent explainations, graphics and | Method | to learn | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | The course is good! But a little bit more on social media. It will be better if we can learn more about tactics and methods of personal branding. | can learn more about tactics and | Method | of personal branding. | Positive | 0.94 | 3.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | I´ve never taken on-line classes, but being this the first time I must say that it is a great method to learn with some flexibility. I would encourage these courses to improve their final assignament grading, as it is the warranty of trusting that any body with a coursera certificate has passed a rigorous evaluation plan. | say that it is a great | Method | to learn with some flexibility. I | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Great course, compact compedium of currently used methods to ceate/analyse company strategy | course, compact compedium of currently used | Method | to ceate/analyse company strategy | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This course was ultimately frustrating to take. There is a gap in the material presented and the skill set needed to complete the assignments. Using optional methods to complete this course, such as to use the textbook and forums, is too time consuming (deciphering a text book) or insulting (forum mentor responses). To to solve the assignments, it usually involved trying to 1. refreshing yourself in math concepts not used by a beginner or non-mathematician, 2. deciphering what exactly the poorly written questions were asking, 3. scouring the textbook or internet for functions or strategies never covered in the lecture, 4. having snarky and unhelpful remarks by mentors. The unprofessional behavior of the mentors was especially hard to handle. Even from the early week's lectures we learned about semantics, and how simple mistyping could lead to programming errors, so I wrongly assumed the mentors would understand that some of us would probably make simple errors. For example, in the final homework I had a simple mistake, but since we cannot show code, it led to more frustration and a mentor basically just saying "we covered this already." I'm well aware of what we covered, but if someone is stuck on a problem, there needs to be a much better way of helping that person. I did not want to write in the forums after my initial foray in the forum led one mentor to just tell me "your logic is wrong", and the spout the same simple strategies of the lecture that could not help on the complex assignment. There probably will not be anything fixed with this course since it seems like it has been the same for years now. Please fix the questions, stop using Project Euler, and let people directly message code to mentors. Will probably save time rather than try to blindly (and frustratingly) explain code over and over again. Ultimately, I felt that unless someone either has previous experience in coding, or has no work to do other than to do this course, it still is not worth it to just obtain a certificate. | to complete the assignments. Using optional | Method | to complete this course, such as | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I am absolutely honored to have been privileged enough to take such a fascinating course on something I'm so passionate about. Dr. Clifford Saron was my favorite part of the course by far; his methods of articulating his teachings, for me, were the easiest to understand and the most engaging/interesting to follow. I will definitely be using the information I've reviewed in this course in both my present and my future. Thank you, to everyone with Coursera & the University of Virginia, who made this MOOC possible. I'm eternally grateful. | of the course by far; his | Method | of articulating his teachings, for me, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I waited a long time for this class to start but now that it is here I find it impossible summon enough will to pay attention to the lectures. As a retired teacher I have more of an ability to stick to a class than many but life is too short to wait for this class to perk up. The professors seem very knowledgable but their teaching methodology leaves a lot to be desired. | seem very knowledgable but their teaching | Method | leaves a lot to be desired. | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | I loved the first three weeks for the really well presented background information. Weeks 4 and 5 did not give me any further interesting knowledge. I also missed lectures on qPCR, NGS and other molecular methods for the detection of antibiotic resistance genes, as these methods are up and coming. Overall, thank you for setting up this course | on qPCR, NGS and other molecular | Method | for the detection of antibiotic resistance | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | I loved the first three weeks for the really well presented background information. Weeks 4 and 5 did not give me any further interesting knowledge. I also missed lectures on qPCR, NGS and other molecular methods for the detection of antibiotic resistance genes, as these methods are up and coming. Overall, thank you for setting up this course | of antibiotic resistance genes, as these | Method | are up and coming. Overall, thank | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | lectures are too long, it lacks clinical correlation. the course focus only technical lab issues, when you look for antimicrobial resistance course, the last thing that you need is tech theory. Of course that some concepts are needed in order to provide fundamental basis, but the main goal is and always will be how to interpret antibiograms and infere the most probable mechanism of resistance. So there is a need for clinical correlation. If its not present, the course should be entitled "Laboratory methods for antimicrobial resistance" | course should be entitled " Laboratory | Method | for antimicrobial resistance" | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | I think this course might have been great if I did it like 5th or 6th in the certificate sequence. I think this course assumes you have a lot of knowledge about both biology and statistics that I do not have, nor will anyone else who has only taken the first intro course. Even after having submitted my final assignment and peer reviewing others, it is not clear whether or not I or any of my classmates used the correct methods to complete the assignment. A valid solution to the final project hasn't even been given to us as part of the course, so I'll never know whether or not I did it correctly. | of my classmates used the correct | Method | to complete the assignment. A valid | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Really enjoyed the methodology and the subjects. For me that didn't know anything about the topic, it opened up a whole new world. | Really enjoyed the | Method | and the subjects. For me that | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | This course on software security was very informative . This is the best place to start off for a beginner as it not only covers the technical aspects of security ,but also talks about modelling threats and identifying adversaries and their capabilities.I however was slightly disappointed with the testing methods of this course.I feel that most of the testing should have been on the basis of projects and a project should have been included every week .But, all in all taking the course was a very pleasant experience and I thoroughly enjoyed all the projects that were given. Looking forward to taking the next course in the specialization!! | was slightly disappointed with the testing | Method | of this course. I feel that | Negative | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | There should me more topics on secure code review methods | more topics on secure code review | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | With all respect, Professor, if you are reading all our comments, I think you are a really smart person and you should take all the negative feedback from your students here, positively and constructively. As having good knowledge will never be equals to able to produce good students. Personally, I feel that you should lower down yourself and speak to the level of your students/audience. Use more simple examples, draw a big picture in our minds on what is this course all about, what are we going to achieve, in each of the topics, what are we going to look at and what methods available. For foundation class like this, I think few simple examples and introducing one or two useful methods in each topic would be more than sufficient to us. The objective should be providing us with the basic knowledge, get us interested in this subject, and able to apply those well taught basic knowledge. As when we are interested, for sure we will go and do more research, and some might even would like to move on to intermediate or advance levels. The key point here is "speak to the level of your audience". Even if you are able to talk everything above the sky and up to the moon. If no one able to understand you, it is useless. | going to look at and what | Method | available. For foundation class like this, | Negative | 0.63 | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | With all respect, Professor, if you are reading all our comments, I think you are a really smart person and you should take all the negative feedback from your students here, positively and constructively. As having good knowledge will never be equals to able to produce good students. Personally, I feel that you should lower down yourself and speak to the level of your students/audience. Use more simple examples, draw a big picture in our minds on what is this course all about, what are we going to achieve, in each of the topics, what are we going to look at and what methods available. For foundation class like this, I think few simple examples and introducing one or two useful methods in each topic would be more than sufficient to us. The objective should be providing us with the basic knowledge, get us interested in this subject, and able to apply those well taught basic knowledge. As when we are interested, for sure we will go and do more research, and some might even would like to move on to intermediate or advance levels. The key point here is "speak to the level of your audience". Even if you are able to talk everything above the sky and up to the moon. If no one able to understand you, it is useless. | and introducing one or two useful | Method | in each topic would be more | Positive | 0.63 | 2.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | It was an interesting overview and a good in-depth method of managing a digital marketing project. I wish there would have been more statistical insight and data analysis exercice. | interesting overview and a good in-depth | Method | of managing a digital marketing project. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Fantastic content, gives me a better understanding of the methodology which I was missing. I had a few problems with the platform, but managed to work after a few days. | me a better understanding of the | Method | which I was missing. I had | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | We need more statements to use when composing emails. More methods and ways to expressing apology and to compose introductions. It was my great pleasure to be enrolled. I learned a lot. Thank you so much. | to use when composing emails. More | Method | and ways to expressing apology and | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good content and methodology. | Very good content and | Method | | Positive | 0.81 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | It's a good course,although it starts a little slowly and then really builds up a lot of steam towards the end. I think it should be paced out to be an 8-week course and include shorter, less ambitious assignments. I personally found that the assignments lead to onerous difficulty unless one actively seeks out different aspects of the language other than what was taught in this course (particularly native list methods), and once that has begun, then the last two weeks of it seem like a long-winded slog. It's nice to be able to learn programming style from Odersky himself. I recommend the text "Functional Programming in Scala" to read and work through during the course. | in this course (particularly native list | Method | and once that has begun, then | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The synopsis for the course claims you need previous programming experience << You should have at least one year programming experience. Proficiency with Java or C# is ideal, but experience with other languages such as C/C++, Python, Javascript or Ruby is also sufficient.>> I don't really have any experience in any of these languages except perhaps C from many years ago. However, I do have experience in Lisp and I found that the languages are extremely similar. In many cases I could think in Lisp and write in Scala, which is sort of like Lisp with type annotations, not always, but often. There are a couple of places in the course where the author assumes you know java. I think this is a mistake. You basically need to know the names of some java methods to work the exercise. But I just asked in the forum and someone gave me the correct method names. | know the names of some java | Method | to work the exercise. But I | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The synopsis for the course claims you need previous programming experience << You should have at least one year programming experience. Proficiency with Java or C# is ideal, but experience with other languages such as C/C++, Python, Javascript or Ruby is also sufficient.>> I don't really have any experience in any of these languages except perhaps C from many years ago. However, I do have experience in Lisp and I found that the languages are extremely similar. In many cases I could think in Lisp and write in Scala, which is sort of like Lisp with type annotations, not always, but often. There are a couple of places in the course where the author assumes you know java. I think this is a mistake. You basically need to know the names of some java methods to work the exercise. But I just asked in the forum and someone gave me the correct method names. | and someone gave me the correct | Method | names. | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Wonderful course, It's a very big pleasure to learn new things with new methods. | to learn new things with new | Method | | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Very detailed and well taught, liked Prof. Birkinshaw's methodology and energy. | and well taught, liked Prof. Birkinshaw's | Method | and energy. | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very informative, educational and well=organized. The professor communicates the lesson clearly and effectively in maintaining one's interest in the course content. I recommend this course to anyone interested in learning about subjective truth, how to be self-seeking, the Socratic Method, and a unique method for challenging traditional thought. | how to be self-seeking, the Socratic | Method | and a unique method for challenging | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very informative, educational and well=organized. The professor communicates the lesson clearly and effectively in maintaining one's interest in the course content. I recommend this course to anyone interested in learning about subjective truth, how to be self-seeking, the Socratic Method, and a unique method for challenging traditional thought. | the Socratic Method, and a unique | Method | for challenging traditional thought. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| C-WALZ3LEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Covers the most important financial decision making tools and explains weakness and strengths of various methods. Comparative focus on concepts such as IRR and NPV apart from integrating these with spreadsheet makes this course a must do for the aspirants. | explains weakness and strengths of various | Method | Comparative focus on concepts such as | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Great teacher. The method of explaining things with pieces of paper was helpful and more interactive than lines simply appearing in the screen. Unfortunately the course is based on calculations and many proofs were left behind. | Great teacher. The | Method | of explaining things with pieces of | Positive | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I thing this course should have one or two more modules. It's definitely to short to grasp the basics of JavaScript. For complete beginners it should start with a module about Foundations of Programming and after explain in depth what is a method, a property, an event, a calculation, a variable, an object, etc.... After I finished all the modules of this course, always coding along the lectures and having done all the assignments to practice and having read the extra material, by the end of this course I didn't had a solid foundation about how to program in JavaScript. So, if you enrolled the Web Design Specialization, after the HTML & CSS's courses you will have solid foundation about those languages, you will also grasp the basics of Responsive Design course but you will have to do other JavaScript courses to became a Junior Front-End Developer in the "real life". | explain in depth what is a | Method | a property, an event, a calculation, | Positive | 0.84 | 2.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good. Probably could use more assignments or links to further tutorials. The final assignment's instructions as they are written mislead English as a Second Language students to use methods that don't contribute to the functionality required in the script. A prior review from a longterm coder who was previously apprehensive of JavaScript before taking this course echoes 80% of my sentiments. This is a gentle but robust introduction for the intimidated, and success in this course is a confidence boost. | a Second Language students to use | Method | that don't contribute to the functionality | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | While there were many typos in screenshots and code examples, this course has been a tremendous help to me as I reinforced some things I already knew about JavaScript and learned new concepts about the JavaScript language (like coding in events or working with the DOM). I definitely feel like a more confident programmer, even though I do wish the instructor could've explained some things in more detail (like when to use the dot attribute notation over the setAttribute method). | dot attribute notation over the setAttribute | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The instructor describes the methodology well. She appears to be very patient and has a great knack for teaching Javascript for each level of understanding. While I have been challenged, there is no sense of overwhelment presented thus far. | The instructor describes the | Method | well. She appears to be very | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | As a beginner student. I enjoyed a good course that it gave me the tools to continue to seek methods to learn JavaScript and everything related to web design. | the tools to continue to seek | Method | to learn JavaScript and everything related | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Method simple, clear, and incredibly effective! Exercises are appropriate and links to external material are really useful. I totally recommend! | | Method | simple, clear, and incredibly effective! Exercises | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course teach me about grammar and punctuation with interactive method, so I can learn every lessons easily. | about grammar and punctuation with interactive | Method | so I can learn every lessons | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I simply loved the methodology of this course. Being my first self-paced course with lots of quizzes and assignments and participation, I thoroughly enjoyed the challenges it posed to learn new skills. I have recommended lots of friends to join this. | I simply loved the | Method | of this course. Being my first | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Computer system internals, hardware and software architectures, concept of abstraction, divide and conquer method, the fun of building hardware, and the fun of writing programs, all combined into this course, in an organised way, I can't think of a better course and a better teaching! | concept of abstraction, divide and conquer | Method | the fun of building hardware, and | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is well put together, however they say you do not need any programming background, but you definitely need a little. I had to use other sources to help such as Codeacademy and Udemy just to keep up. The do not go over loops, conditionals or basic C foundation that would help. The leap from HTML, CSS to JavaScript is massive. They need to relook some of the topics and either more videos or add in some easier teaching methods. I took a similar one on Udemy (that was free) just after I completed this one and it was 10x easier to understand and closed so many loops I had when learning JavaScript. | or add in some easier teaching | Method | I took a similar one on | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The first two weeks the course present a reasonable pace for beginners. The second two weeks, when the Java Script is introduced, the projects suddenly become very hard. It is assumed you understand binary numbers. Coding is introduced without a lot of explanation of Java Script syntax or methods or what actually happens when you write a line of code. The idea of hiding an image within an image is interesting but I do not see that as important for beginners web developers- how is this relevant to building a web site? | explanation of Java Script syntax or | Method | or what actually happens when you | Negative | 0.91 | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have learnt a lot in this course. Also it is great that the methodology and algorithm are taught systematically | Also it is great that the | Method | and algorithm are taught systematically | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| d5HHlUTlEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Absolutely brilliant course. Each lesson is thoroughly enjoyable thanks to the charisma and passion of Bernard Lafayette, as well as eye-opening and educational in an astoundingly refreshing way. This course doesn't just teach a concept, it motivates you to do something with the information and guides students towards an important method in attaining social change. The history and ongoing philosophy and campaign are nothing short of inspirational. | and guides students towards an important | Method | in attaining social change. The history | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I had been gone through this marvelous course during previous months and found it very useful for teachers of second language, especially ones who are learning or teaching through grammar translation method. | learning or teaching through grammar translation | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course is well done and will definitely serve many teachers who would want to draw from history and gain some tested approaches to teaching English. The teaching method can be not so academic but for many people, this perhaps serves best. | approaches to teaching English. The teaching | Method | can be not so academic but | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | very detailed and instructive, I'll definitely apply those methods into my own class!Thanks for your efforts to make such good course! | and instructive, I'll definitely apply those | Method | into my own class! Thanks for | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is course is useful for teachers who are interested in teaching English as a second language and particularly who wish to use combinations of historically evolved methods in contemporary teaching. I derived a lot of benefit from the course. I thank all the teachers for their inputs. | to use combinations of historically evolved | Method | in contemporary teaching. I derived a | Positive | 0.62 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Love the way Dr. Shane is representing different approaches with appropriate dress code & dialogues from previous eras.. I have learned all these methods before in my TESOL course of final year Literature studies. Its like revising all the knowledge that I had learned 6 months back in 2015. (Y) | . I have learned all these | Method | before in my TESOL course of | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | wonderful course that gave me a very strong historical background about methods of teaching. I would like to retake it again in this is available in the future. Ameer | a very strong historical background about | Method | of teaching. I would like to | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I like how the course was structured, it made it easier to absorb all the historical comparisons of instruction methods. | all the historical comparisons of instruction | Method | | Positive | 0.83 | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good course, great teachers, nice methodology... I reccomend! | Very good course, great teachers, nice | Method | . . I reccomend! | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good course that can help to find out or identify your own teaching method or philosophy | out or identify your own teaching | Method | or philosophy | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Cool! Thanks a lot for such a wonderful opportunity to have a clearer view of chronology of ESL approaches. It gives more confidence and understanding what this or that technique is used for. I know much more than I used to and therefore, I develop my teaching and methodology awareness. I look forward to the next course and hope I will implement it widely in my practice. | therefore, I develop my teaching and | Method | awareness. I look forward to the | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I appreciate i have got the teaching course. and I have have learnt a lot of teaching methods and pedagogies such as Grammar Translation Approach, Audio-lingual Approach and so on. The most important thing is that it's not just a course but stimulation to me. | have learnt a lot of teaching | Method | and pedagogies such as Grammar Translation | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A bit more challenging than the first Module, bit with the same great methodology to deliver the information and keep students engaged. The course content is clear and concise. Thank you! | Module, bit with the same great | Method | to deliver the information and keep | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Quite an useful way to understand methods on teaching. Quite recommended too. | Quite an useful way to understand | Method | on teaching. Quite recommended too. | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course presents various methods to learners and teachers how English should be taught in an extremely effective manner. The videos are well prepared and each lesson has been provided a well structured lesson for all kinds of learners. Keep it up! | This course presents various | Method | to learners and teachers how English | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | thanks for the course, but -your quizzes is real pain, some random variable could cause wrong result -your should follow how it is implemented in lectures in stupid way, like "efficient" way when you build hash map N^2 instead of N -bluej sucks you make a lot of clicks to run method, use some decent IDE like eclipse or idea | a lot of clicks to run | Method | use some decent IDE like eclipse | Negative | 0.89 | 1.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | The assignments do not give you any practical methods for actual problem solving. They're just a succession of activities that pretend to be creative by making you do things "you wouldn't normally do". It's like they forgot the part about "problem solving". The assignments are to eat foods you've never eaten, talk to people you wouldn't normally talk to, take a photo of yourself smooching someone/something, and to "give" something to someone you "never have given anything before". That is not creative nor helpful at problem solving. It's just a series of activities for people who have too much time on their hand and need something to do to get out of their routine. Not a course I would recommend for anyone wanting to gain useful skills. | do not give you any practical | Method | for actual problem solving. They're just | Negative | 0.86 | 1.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | I'm not a cyber professional, but I deal with a lot of security issues just as a part of the job. I'm also researching new hardware methods for cyber security systems. I found aspects of this course to be useful to me. Enjoyed the | job. I'm also researching new hardware | Method | for cyber security systems. I found | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I highly recommend this course. Easy to follow, good contents and great teaching methodology. It's an introductory course. | follow, good contents and great teaching | Method | It's an introductory course. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I feel satisfactory with methodology from course, now with this new knowlegde, can make more in the Software of Project. Thanks so much, regard. | I feel satisfactory with | Method | from course, now with this new | Negative | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A very good course, offered in very smart method Clear course objectives, good notes, language suitable for non-native speakers, excellent filming quality and the plus is using cartons which simplify the ideas Thanks university of Alberta and all the instructors | good course, offered in very smart | Method | Clear course objectives, good notes, language | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good Course, Good introduction to Agile Methodology | Good Course, Good introduction to Agile | Method | | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | I appreciated the professor's clear and articulate lectures, together with the use of in-lecture questions to reinforce the main concepts. I may not completely agree with all of the points raised by the good professor, but the perspective he offered on historical events was greatly appreciated. I also appreciated that approaching the methods of war within different cultures would have required a much larger and longer course and so I am grateful to the professor for placing his focus where he did. It is unfortunate that my timing in participating in this class reduced my ability to properly interact with other students during the progress of the lessons, but I have to accept responsibility for that aspect. Still, I consider this to be one of the more exceptional courses offered by Coursera and credit that largely to the presentation skills of the good professor. I thank him for sharing his knowledge and this opportunity to consider a topic I would not ordinarily study in such detail. | I also appreciated that approaching the | Method | of war within different cultures would | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Very interesting course. It helped me gain a more profound understanding of the methods of warmaking and the power an organised, well-coordinated action of a group of people has in general. The teaching approach of the professor Miguel Centeno has been one of the basic reasons for which this couse has been both so delightful and enriching. I would strongly recomend this course to everyone that is interested in the field of international affairs. | a more profound understanding of the | Method | of warmaking and the power an | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course and I learned alot. Love the teaching methods. | I learned alot. Love the teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | The course has been very interesting, the methodology with videos and lots of real examples has helped me to learn very easily, starting from zero. The course has given to me a very solid foundation knowledge about financial accounting without being familiar with it before. I really recommend this course for those who are not familiar with financial accounting and want to understand it and build a solid foundation knowledge. | course has been very interesting, the | Method | with videos and lots of real | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Thanks spm team, I learned a lot about requirement and the methodology we could apply on the real project, it opens a new door for me, and it helps in my work. | a lot about requirement and the | Method | we could apply on the real | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | That's interesting course - a practical method of learning a theory topic. I like the way people interact in assignments. Thanks so much. | That's interesting course - a practical | Method | of learning a theory topic. I | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | Some of the lectures were too general, too fast, or left things out I also don't like the peer review type grading structure Also, I am sure I'm not the only person taking this course (or the whole series), who does not CURRENTLY, have a career in healthcare; I am working towards that - So; to ask us to do a market sizing memo and come up with something from nothing, while swearing not to plagiarize, is not a good method. I'm here to gain knowledge and skills - a broad overview. Perhaps a course or actual 2nd degree in Health Info Tech or Healthcare Admin. is better way to go for me; however, I cannot afford it finance or time - therefore, am trying to learn as much as possible off here. Kudsos to Parente for having super cool interests though - the sailing, the places he sails and the awesome vacation home in the Scottish Highlands! | to plagiarize, is not a good | Method | I'm here to gain knowledge and | Negative | 0.96 | 3.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | I enjoyed this course but I was not satisfied with the assessment. The content kept me engaged and highly motivated. I acquired some very specific and useful skills, which I developed by completing projects on topics of my choosing that were meaningful to me. I really liked Karl's casual and somewhat spontaneous style - this is a breath of fresh air from the video tutorials out there where lecturers are reading from prompts or reciting from memory. The biggest drawback to this course is that it relied completely on peer grading for the assessment (which you have to pay for). I don't think this assessment method was sufficiently designed to reduce the influence of graders who were overly subjective, hadn't sufficiently mastered the content themselves, or were disinterested in putting effort into the peer review. From now on, I will think twice about paying for any course where all of the assessment is based on how my classmates grade me. While peer review can be useful for learning, I don't think it's an accurate assessment tool. Especially if I'm paying to learn from a professional in a field, I'd expect to receive some feedback and assessment from that pro. Another area of improvement is that there were several instances where videos repeated things covered in previous videos. These things could be cleaned up a bit and the course would be more polished. | for). I don't think this assessment | Method | was sufficiently designed to reduce the | Negative | 0.84 | 3.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | The method of delivery is a bit conservative, dry and boring but matter wise, it was really comprehensive and easy to understand. Good beginner course. | The | Method | of delivery is a bit conservative, | Positive | 0.95 | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Most of the materials are conceptual, would like to see more real life examples and methods applied. | see more real life examples and | Method | applied. | Positive | 0.92 | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Thank you prof. Jong - Moon Chung for your wonderful method of teaching.ruly enjoyed my learning experience | - Moon Chung for your wonderful | Method | of teaching. ruly enjoyed my learning | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | I find this course to be very practical and very rewarding. After a week I can come up with two-handed chords and comp with a singer or a soloist (after some prep right now). I found the various options for improvising to be very informative. I enjoy the teacher very much, he is enthusiastic and friendly and has excellent tips for practicing. I like the way the course is structured, working from a simple blues to more involved but still conforming to the basic blues structure. I was fascinated by pentatonic chords and I am determined to come up with an arrangement of my own using these chord types. The drop-2 approach is a very useful way to get a great sound and is useful for comping. Guide tones and voice leading are extremely useful also and an essential tool in any jazz performer's portfolio. I plan to practice these various methods and I will probably buy the teacher's book to see if I can advance my skills further. I plan to use the play-along sessions to improve my improvising skills. I really enjoy playing with the band! Thank you so much for this great course. | I plan to practice these various | Method | and I will probably buy the | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | This is a good basic intro to both statistical concepts (correlations, analysis of variance (ANOVA) ), but also presents the methods for coding these tools in Python or SAS in a very accessible and easy to follow way. | (ANOVA) ), but also presents the | Method | for coding these tools in Python | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| eo6NBCQPEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I found this course to be extremely informative, filled with the latest research findings and recommendations to assist those working with dyslexic learners to improve reading comprehension and writing. I have a better understanding of dyslexia, exspecially the psychological and neurological aspects. I have learned how the English language has evolved (opaque) and the challenges this presents to those with dyslexia. This course if filled with suggestions on how to make a learning environment more inclusive for those with dyslexia, incorporating multisensory teaching methods and explanations of the different learning styles, including planning to adjust to working memory capacity of learner. I highly recommend this course- don't miss it! | those with dyslexia, incorporating multisensory teaching | Method | and explanations of the different learning | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Far less staid than some of the more traditional academic teaching formats in this science field. I was surprised I actually anaged to get through the introductory module but by the end of the course I was less inclined to want to attempt the end of module project simply because the instructions did not really provided sufficient indicators that guided newcomers to the subject of programming but in this science field it seems that is the norm with many introductory programming courses. Maybe the people teaching have forgotten what its like to start at the beginning and recall a time when they thought surely there is a better way in which to teach this subject that makes the connection between theory and practice and the relative interconnection much like bitesize stepping stones links a more plausible and achievable option for those unfamiliar in the field of computer science. Not sure why this aspect seems to fall short in CS but for some reason it does. I should imagine this course for many people who are either familiar with the fundamentals of programming and/or aufait with CS concepts on the whole and have already acquired the necessary basic skill set / knowledge base of programming, will find the subject and teachings rather informative and a move forward in the development of programming languages as the format in writing programs does depict a much simpler approach when compared to other languages. Sadly, for a complete beginner to CS this, in my opinion, fails to sufficiently guide or assist newcomers in building the confidence to later embark on a project that draws on the subject topics taught thus far and to that end its a bit of a shame as it tends to dampen your enthusiasm if you are interested in the field of computer science as that lack of clarification on what aspects relate to what factors does not become clear so when faced with the daunting task of the end of module project you may find yourself non-plussed wondering which topic relates to which task in the final project? I am sure other people will be inclined to disagree with my opinion on this but this is, after all, just my opinion, after giving the subject taster a try, the end result for me, was that the teaching methods were good as they appeared more relaxed and format was offered in a far more enjoyable way of teaching/learning a subject that, I felt, attempted to invoke or entice people where an interest in CS had been sparked and was perhaps aiming to offer a route in which to build the foundations of a programming language but then by the final week it was a case of well we have thrown this information your way, its now up to you to decipher what you need to apply to the which part of the final project and is done so under the guise of problem solving. The latter being a plausible concept I would find perhaps more applicable later on in the specialisation as you develop knowledge/skills. But to be incorporated into the very first module of this pathway it seems doing so is, what it seems like most introductory programming courses invoke, and, is quite a leap to embark upon especially without first being offered stepping stones sufficient enough to feel certain you have adequate understanding to be able to sift through the information provided and subsequently decide upon which aspects are relevant in order to attempt to accomplish the tasks set that ultimately form to complete the final project. Its actually through being guided by the experts whose teachings highlight to newcomers through practical visual sessions where we actually begin to learn where these interconnections link between these chunks of informational topics - all of which form the essential fundamental building blocks - and in so doing, that perhaps perceived initial 'spoon fed' approach then enables a newcomer to build sufficient skills and knowledge to then be able to actually 'develop' their confidence. Without the essential basic foundational mixture how is it possible to engage newcomers enough for them to determine when they will then feel equipped to attempt a final project? This stepping stone approach is surely the most effective way to equip a person new to a subject field so they can then broaden their knowledge base. Alas, in CS it seems the falling flat on your face so to speak is a preferential approach to learning in this field of study. Its such a shame these highly intellectual people who create these courses forget what its like to start at the very beginning and the time it takes and guidance needed in order for a person to be able to feel like they are ready to dive in and give a topic like this a whirl. Like I said, its only my opinion but this is where the interconnection and building of the knowledge base falls short at an early stage of development. | for me, was that the teaching | Method | were good as they appeared more | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | excellent reconnection of knowledges obtained through reductionist methodology | reconnection of knowledges obtained through reductionist | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Excellent course. I learned a lot. Amity Gaige is a terrific instructor. I enjoyed her method of teaching. | a terrific instructor. I enjoyed her | Method | of teaching. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | I think it would be useful if the course had a bit more videos with theoretical material on scientific methodology. But the course format is excellent, dynamic and captivating. | videos with theoretical material on scientific | Method | But the course format is excellent, | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It was nice and abundant for the 'basic' understanding about research methods. It leads to the further more deepen methodological approaches. If you already know about qualitative or quantitative something, it will be easy for you however if you are unfamiliar any other methodological approaches, this course give you essential information about that. | for the 'basic' understanding about research | Method | It leads to the further more | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | get one on track with research | Method | Take this course, as it is | Positive | 0.75 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Good on line course work in research methodology | on line course work in research | Method | | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This was a great introductory course. I particularly appreciated the text book chapter being included as it was a really useful resource. Compared to some other Coursera courses (quantitative and qualitative research methods) there were many fewer lectures and resources. That's why I rated it a 4/5. I'm getting more out of the other two, but this was a fantastic introduction to get me thinking. | Coursera courses (quantitative and qualitative research | Method | there were many fewer lectures and | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | I am really impressed with the opinion and examples from different scholars on each topic of each lesson of the week. This gives me a better grasp on understanding Research Methodology Clearer which I couldn't even attain when I was in my unstandardized college in Cambodia. I'd definitely recommend this course to my fellow and junior classmates who wish to study research. | a better grasp on understanding Research | Method | Clearer which I couldn't even attain | Negative | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Instead of interviewing different people, it could have animations and infographics to explain the research methods. | and infographics to explain the research | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Taking this course has indeed improved and deepened my intellectual rigor and it has motivated me to take additional courses on Research Methods from University of Amsterdam. The Course is an eye opener into the world of Research Methods. | to take additional courses on Research | Method | from University of Amsterdam. The Course | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Taking this course has indeed improved and deepened my intellectual rigor and it has motivated me to take additional courses on Research Methods from University of Amsterdam. The Course is an eye opener into the world of Research Methods. | opener into the world of Research | Method | | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This course is really helpful in understanding research methods as well as adding up a lot of information | is really helpful in understanding research | Method | as well as adding up a | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This course is nicely organized and has manageable readings & videos. The video quality could be better. It's very very basic information about research. It might be useful to someone who does not know anything about it at all. The title might lead one to expect that methods of research such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method would be explored. Rather, this course is a general overview of what research is. | might lead one to expect that | Method | of research such as qualitative, quantitative, | Positive | 0.68 | 2.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This course is nicely organized and has manageable readings & videos. The video quality could be better. It's very very basic information about research. It might be useful to someone who does not know anything about it at all. The title might lead one to expect that methods of research such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method would be explored. Rather, this course is a general overview of what research is. | such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed | Method | would be explored. Rather, this course | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | The course should be renamed as Basics of Research Method. | be renamed as Basics of Research | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Some parts were good but overall the course was lacking in its ability to add value. There were generic discussions. Week 3 was almost useless; had it not been for a good reading provided for an assignment, it was too basic. Add some specificity in the course or name it Basics of Research Methods. | or name it Basics of Research | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This is an excellent course to understand research methods. | an excellent course to understand research | Method | | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | In terms of delivery, the course delivery was very simple, critical and relevant. The course content was very engaging as it included interviews with graduate students and professors alike who are doing their researches. Quite fittingly, I commend the creators of this course for recognizing the fact that most online courses on research methods out there focus on having a linear tackling of lesson topics. For this course, it stressed the key issues and reflections of individuals who are doing the actual rudiments of the thing we call "research". More importantly, this course was also critical and relevant in many respects as it allowed us to have some write-ups about the topics without requiring us to go through many readings. It is in this sense that I would say that it its relevant--concise and direct in its approach, the instructors have seen to it that what they are to discuss will be the things which new comers to the research endeavor might ask. Kudos to the team! And my warmest regards to all of you! =D | that most online courses on research | Method | out there focus on having a | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | A very fruitful effort and a nice MOOC by Univ of London allowing many many people/researchers across the globe to learn about state of art research methods which are usually not taught at MPhil or PhD levels. | learn about state of art research | Method | which are usually not taught at | Positive | 0.63 | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It's great to understand more of research methods in application, but I wish there were more resources provided to supplement our study. In general, this is a good course for those who start thinking of doing research in the future | great to understand more of research | Method | in application, but I wish there | Positive | 0.97 | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | very useful for me to get to know something about research method. Thanks. | get to know something about research | Method | Thanks. | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Great introduction to research methods for anyone contemplating a research masters of Phd. I haven't studied for a while, so found the course content particularly useful. Course is taught through a combination of videos, readings and weekly assignments which are peer reviewed. Weeks 2 and 3 of the course are particularly useful. | Great introduction to research | Method | for anyone contemplating a research masters | Positive | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Unforgetable method of teaching, in this course we are not studying we are learning automatically. It is like a method & topic & way of teaching that automatically involved the people. And at the end you understand completely. | Unforgetable | Method | of teaching, in this course we | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Unforgetable method of teaching, in this course we are not studying we are learning automatically. It is like a method & topic & way of teaching that automatically involved the people. And at the end you understand completely. | learning automatically. It is like a | Method | & topic & way of teaching | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very interesting topics and very good teaching method. Recommended. | interesting topics and very good teaching | Method | Recommended. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | It is an excellent course in all senses:content and methodology, Great teacher | excellent course in all senses:content and | Method | Great teacher | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | There is no real flow between videos and questions, not easy to follow. Good efford, good content, just wrong methodology for online training for 2015. | Good efford, good content, just wrong | Method | for online training for 2015. | Negative | 0.92 | 1.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | This course help me understand history of epidemology, study design and methods to measure association and causaliy. I am very satisfied with this course. I appreciate | history of epidemology, study design and | Method | to measure association and causaliy. I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | It was a good basic intro into the statistical methods of epidemiology. Quite basic. | good basic intro into the statistical | Method | of epidemiology. Quite basic. | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Outstanding class, great approach to covering the topics. Maybe a bit more time on the new method of doing the slideshow though? It's a bit overly complex. | bit more time on the new | Method | of doing the slideshow though? It's | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Very effective overview of quant methods. Gives us a good foundation for digging deeper in the recommended texts. It even has a theme song! | Very effective overview of quant | Method | Gives us a good foundation for | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Highly appealing subject matter but this was not the course I should have chosen to learn it from. The topics discussed are relevant, but there were some major drawbacks to this course: Limited academic rigour applied to the actual topics; instead they are discussed in a somewhat wordy and vague manner. Very slow progression beyond the most basic topics. At the beginning and end of each video there are some odd sound effects, and during the course itself the microphone the instructor is using seems to be very temperamental - sometimes I can't hear him at all, sometimes it's way too loud The software that is meant to be used has not been updated in 3 years (Jul13), and you notice it: A bug results in the software 'failing' during one of the homework assignments - students in this course had to fix it ad hoc themselves by changing the source code installed on their machine. Further, the assignments were not quite instructive but more a method of 'rote learning' -- amend the existing code, and then change 1-3 inputs and copy-paste the output into the 'quiz'. I didn't feel I was gaining much insight into the theory + subject matter during homeworks + quiz. The course videos also seem to be much more ad-hoc than I was expecting: There are many examples of 'Uhms...' 'Err's and pauses - there only seems to be a vague description of what is meant to be taught in the individual videos, where a set of points and theories to be discussed in a organized rigid manner may have been more appropriate. To conclude, there is no doubt that the instructor knows what he is talking about, but I can't help but feel that this course was put together quite hurriedly without much quality testing and preparation. It also lacks the depth and breadth of other courses available here and elsewhere. I signed up to this course under the 'Verified Track' and am likely not going to complete it despite having paid $$ to sign up. Having said all that I would definitely sign up to Computational Investing , Part II, as I would expect the team behind this course to be doing things differently (ie a lot better) 3-4 years after this course was made! | not quite instructive but more a | Method | of 'rote learning' -- amend the | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Pretty cool course. I hope they come out with two course sequences, one based more on theory that doesn't back away from stochastic calc so much, and another on practical methods using something other than excel. | so much, and another on practical | Method | using something other than excel. | Negative | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | This course is a great, from the perspective of how it is organized as well as the assignments provided at the end of each module. The way the content layout is well-suited and leads student step by step gaining insight to the mechanics of different financial derivatives and working on those assignments is a great method of pushing student spend time to understand how the mechanics works. Both instructors are great! and I appreciated greatly their effort as well as Coursera. The only one improvement I would suggest is that if a TA can be assigned for this course, it'll be a great help to all students. Thanks! | on those assignments is a great | Method | of pushing student spend time to | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | method of teaching is fantastic more programming example may be added | | Method | of teaching is fantastic more programming | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | very clear and precise teaching methods. very informative and practical lessons. | very clear and precise teaching | Method | very informative and practical lessons. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | I am a master student in sustainable manufacturing. So, I enrolled for the course as it seemed to sustainability related at one point. It is a very useful course not only for people in the same stream but also for every individual. Course enlightens the student with what is happening with the environment and how dangerous it could turn if sustainable methods are not adopted. Provides the basic information on waste management especially gives an idea on how to safe guard a developing country from solid waste. For me this has been very useful course. I felt like the course once again remind the duties of a citizen to safe the planet. | dangerous it could turn if sustainable | Method | are not adopted. Provides the basic | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | My rating of this course is excellent, because the quality is high. Interviews expert Don Norman was exciting, because it is one of the most important personalities in this field. Professor Scott, has very good methodology to give lessons, good explanation. It is a course where you can learn and put into practice what he learned very quickly. | field. Professor Scott, has very good | Method | to give lessons, good explanation. It | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | As a seasoned teacher, 20 years, much of this content is intuitive or has already been in place in my classroom. The course validated much of the methodology I already use, but I did lose interest from time to time. | The course validated much of the | Method | I already use, but I did | Negative | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Gives great insight into the main methods used in machine learning. | Gives great insight into the main | Method | used in machine learning. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great methodology! Interesting content and easy to follow even if the student does not have a strong background. | Great | Method | Interesting content and easy to follow | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is one of the best things i've ever seen on this matter. Prof Andrew's method os explanation is quite useful and easy to understand, even if your not totally familiar with the subject. | seen on this matter. Prof Andrew's | Method | os explanation is quite useful and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Ng and the entire coursera team on pulling off such a great introductory course. Honestly, machine learning is such a vast topic, that every nook and cranny of the internet has some opinion or the other on its methods. It can get pretty daunting for a beginner. This course is a perfect balance of theory and practice. It doesn't get too "mathy", nor does it get too dumbed down on it. The basic ideas, their implementations are discussed thoroughly, and Dr. Ng himself is such a smooth lecturer. A section on what to do after finishing this course would be helpful, as there are so many domains of machine learning, that it can get pretty confusing to decide. Also, I found the assignment tutorials a bit vague. Multiple times, I happened to scratch my head trying to figure what exactly the assignment in asking me to do. Clearer explanations of what to do in the assignments would be great. All in all, a wonderful course. Thanks a ton! | opinion or the other on its | Method | It can get pretty daunting for | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The method of teaching is very good. The programming assignments help a lot in actual understanding of the the algorithm. Very interesting course. You will definitely enjoy it. Thank you!! Happy learning!! | The | Method | of teaching is very good. The | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a nice course for getting started with machine learning and AI. I used this course for learning side by side with my college. At college they generally teach nothing much about AI just some theories of important concepts like neural networks and things like that. But this course made me understand everything. And the teaching methodology is very nice. It keeps students in track. The professor makes learning fun maybe that's the reason why am enjoying this course | me understand everything. And the teaching | Method | is very nice. It keeps students | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | One of the most impressive courses I ever had. Dr. Ng assumed that every student was the beginner and explained those complex theory and method in plain words. Strongly recommended this course and I will surely broadcast among my friends and colleagues. | and explained those complex theory and | Method | in plain words. Strongly recommended this | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Gently-paced and reasonable in terms of course work load, even for a busy person. This course greatly demystified machine learning for me. Alvin's lectures are friendly and easy to follow, and progress smoothly from one point of interest to the next, always taking time to briefly recap on precursor topics that were previously discussed. I really appreciate how the assignments focus on the core algorithms and their implementation. Ancillary implementation steps and a scaffolding for testing and viewing the results are already given for the learner to use, play with, and go back and reference for educational purposes if need be, for refreshing on use of tools such as plotting methods. The way the assignments are structured, putting emphasis on filling in the gaps with implementation of the important algorithms, makes completing assignments a very satisfying and fulfilling experience. I feared I would get caught up in preliminary steps, i.e. getting plots to display correctly or cleaning up the data, but that's all taken care of so that one can focus on practicing the techniques most relevant to the topic and algorithms. I only wish there were more assignments to complete, both to cover more of the course's material and to have more chances to practice algorithm prototyping in Octave/Matlab. | use of tools such as plotting | Method | The way the assignments are structured, | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great course for learning some fundamental concepts of machine learning, and hands-on experience with implementing several methods. | and hands-on experience with implementing several | Method | | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Want to learn what Machine Learning is all about? Want to get the skills to start developing machine learning applications, but not to be "tied up" to a single tool or methodology? This is the course for you! | up" to a single tool or | Method | This is the course for you! | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent introduction to various machine learning methods. Dr Ng's clear and succinct exposition makes light work of the theory, but if you pay attention and work through the exercises there is greater depth than first meets the eye. | excellent introduction to various machine learning | Method | Dr Ng's clear and succinct exposition | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a great Course overall. Its Content is great and the method of teaching is amazing. | Its Content is great and the | Method | of teaching is amazing. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! although I'm familiar with statistics, calculus and linear algebra and most of the "academic" methods Andrew presented I've enjoyed the simple everyone-can-understand explanations. Thanks A lot! Ron. | and most of the " academic" | Method | Andrew presented I've enjoyed the simple | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Taught me squared error method very easily (unlike some other courses on coursera). | Excellent course. Taught me squared error | Method | very easily (unlike some other courses | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | separate basic maths part, all the | Method | presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | part, all the methods presented here, | Method | applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course, has many useful information and methods | course, has many useful information and | Method | | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was a great introduction to machine learning (ML). Besides the ML concepts and methods, the course explained the necessary mathematical and statistical concepts in a clear and simple manner. I believe people who have not done much maths or stats should be able to follow the materials. ML concepts were explained in a clear fashion with relevant examples and a good level of depth. The weekly programming exercises require the student put aside at least 2 hours but they are interesting and not impossibly challenging. | (ML). Besides the ML concepts and | Method | the course explained the necessary mathematical | Negative | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was a wonderful class.The patter and methodology used was excellent. Enjoyed learning . Keep up the good work professor , Thanks a lot Coursera !!!!! | a wonderful class. The patter and | Method | used was excellent. Enjoyed learning . | Positive | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | One of the best classes I have taken so far. Andrew NG provides excellent intuition for the algorithms he covers. Machine learning techniques like decision trees and ensemble methods which are not covered here. I would also like to recommend that - it's not a beginner's course. Previous experience in linear algebra and programming experience is required, otherwise you'll get stuck. So prepare well and must do this course. Huge recommendation! | techniques like decision trees and ensemble | Method | which are not covered here. I | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Perfect courses! By this course, I have learnt many things about Machine Learning. True, it is so wonderful that Andrew Ng could take many abstract concepts into some straightforward things, thanks a lots! I can guarantee that if you could insist on completing this course totally, you would find you've mastered many useful knowledge. Of course, knowledge is endless, if you're really interested in this field, then go for it by as many methods as possible you can find, and don't restrict yourself to this course. | go for it by as many | Method | as possible you can find, and | Negative | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course and probably one of the the best introductions into the modern machine learning area. It not just about different machine learning algorithms and techniques. It gives deep understanding which method is better to choose for each particular problem, how to apply, evaluate and optimize different methods. | techniques. It gives deep understanding which | Method | is better to choose for each | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course and probably one of the the best introductions into the modern machine learning area. It not just about different machine learning algorithms and techniques. It gives deep understanding which method is better to choose for each particular problem, how to apply, evaluate and optimize different methods. | to apply, evaluate and optimize different | Method | | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course that I really enjoyed! Takes you from motivation, simple ML methods to sophisticated ML methods like Neural Network, and SVM. Along the way we get to see current applications of ML in academia and industry. | Takes you from motivation, simple ML | Method | to sophisticated ML methods like Neural | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course that I really enjoyed! Takes you from motivation, simple ML methods to sophisticated ML methods like Neural Network, and SVM. Along the way we get to see current applications of ML in academia and industry. | simple ML methods to sophisticated ML | Method | like Neural Network, and SVM. Along | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good overview of machine learning and its mainstream tools. The instructor also provides a very good summary of rules of thumb for applying these tools in practice. A methodology for systematically applying machine learning in any kind of problems is also included. It gives a very good background for starters. | applying these tools in practice. A | Method | for systematically applying machine learning in | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, it's easy to follow and help u understand the essence of various algorithms and methods! | the essence of various algorithms and | Method | | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very great course which gives me the fundamental methodology of machine learning and some hand-on experience with some of the most popular learning algorithms. I would review this course to everybody if they start learning machine learning. | course which gives me the fundamental | Method | of machine learning and some hand-on | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The instructor Andrew NG is very good with his material and his explanation methods, but the course does not delve much into the details of the methods. My expectation of the course was that it would explain the core mathematics behind the scenes. | with his material and his explanation | Method | but the course does not delve | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The instructor Andrew NG is very good with his material and his explanation methods, but the course does not delve much into the details of the methods. My expectation of the course was that it would explain the core mathematics behind the scenes. | much into the details of the | Method | My expectation of the course was | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting and useful class that gives brief introduction of machine learning methods. Great course! | gives brief introduction of machine learning | Method | Great course! | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is such a good course that gives a good intuition into Machine Learning. For me it has given a new sense of appetite to learn and revisit Multivariable calculus, Numerical Methods, Probability. I hope it will trigger the same for many others too. The prof has taken a lot of effort to help us visualise Machine Learning. His efforts are truly appreciated! I would strongly recommend this course for everyone suitable and most importantly interested in the subject. | learn and revisit Multivariable calculus, Numerical | Method | Probability. I hope it will trigger | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I wish the materials went faster but if this speed is necessary for something my opinion now doesn't matter. Used really cool method of explaining. | now doesn't matter. Used really cool | Method | of explaining. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A fantastic introduction to machine learning methods. The lectures are informative and insightful, and the homework makes you get your hands dirty with the algorithms. The homework has you code the significant algorithms of the section in MATLAB or Octave. No wonder why it's one of the popular course on Coursera. | A fantastic introduction to machine learning | Method | The lectures are informative and insightful, | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thoroughly enjoyed the class. It is very well taught and very well structured! As a working professional in AE, I really appreciated having a concise overview of existing methods in Machine Learning. I feel that I am now up-to-date on the fundamentals, sufficiently enough to start cross-fertilizing these ideas to my field. Thank you! | having a concise overview of existing | Method | in Machine Learning. I feel that | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course. Makes it easy to understand basic concepts and algorithms of most popular ML methods through program assignments. Methods like logistic regression, SVM and Neural Networks become easy to comprehend and are not a "black box" anymore. | and algorithms of most popular ML | Method | through program assignments. Methods like logistic | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course. Makes it easy to understand basic concepts and algorithms of most popular ML methods through program assignments. Methods like logistic regression, SVM and Neural Networks become easy to comprehend and are not a "black box" anymore. | popular ML methods through program assignments. | Method | like logistic regression, SVM and Neural | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great introduction to the field of Machine Learning to novices. The step by step method to explain this complex field in simple terms is really helpful. I would really recommend this as the first course in Machine learning for somebody interested in forming a strong foundation. Good mix of theory and practice. Thanks Andrew Ng for sharing his knowledge. Looking forward to more courses from him in future. | to novices. The step by step | Method | to explain this complex field in | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is quite basic in that it offers intuition and insights of ml methods in a less math-heavy fashion. It would be nice if more material/additional optional reading is offered for someone interested in the proof of some key points. | offers intuition and insights of ml | Method | in a less math-heavy fashion. It | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is a great teacher and his teaching method is excellent. | a great teacher and his teaching | Method | is excellent. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great great machine learning introductory course with a lot ground covered -- but the best part is most of these methods are nicely packed into one convex optimization algorithm gradient descent. There are a lot of "tricks" that will be very helpful in real world projects. | best part is most of these | Method | are nicely packed into one convex | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best online course i've ever attended. The explainations are crystal clear even for non-methematicians and the topic is widely covered ( No deep learning nor bayesian methods though). If only my former college teachers would've been half that good.. | ( No deep learning nor bayesian | Method | though). If only my former college | Negative | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | confident in my use of the | Method | that Prof. Ng taught. The programming | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | the implementational details of each learning | Method | and usually provide examples to illustrate | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | their way into my projects. These | Method | are applicable to almost any quantitative | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | either to prepare to implement the | Method | themselves, or to just start thinking | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I would totally recommend this course to someone looking to get an insight about the most popular methods of machine learning. The video lectures are well explained and the programming exercices are a really good guidance to learn by yourself to put everything in practice. | an insight about the most popular | Method | of machine learning. The video lectures | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really helpful, explanatory and teaching class! I'm learning a lot of practical methods which can be applied on many systems. The level of classes are enough for many people from different backgrounds. Thanks to all contributors especially to Andrew Ng! :) | I'm learning a lot of practical | Method | which can be applied on many | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Explanation of each topic is so Excellent. And Teaching Methodology is like as we required. Every programmer should have the knowledge of Machine Learning | topic is so Excellent. And Teaching | Method | is like as we required. Every | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Learned a cool lot especially diagnostic methods for bias-variance issues. I enjoyed doing the programming exercises. The last lecture was very essential where you get to see how to build ML pipeline for one whole project and also the ceiling analysis discussed along with it. Prof Ng is indeed pro in the field. | Learned a cool lot especially diagnostic | Method | for bias-variance issues. I enjoyed doing | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The machine learning methods introduced in this course are very powerful. And the course was taught in a way that's easier to understand. | The machine learning | Method | introduced in this course are very | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent methodology, very adaptable and efficient. | Excellent | Method | very adaptable and efficient. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course with good methodology. I liked the assignments and I was motivated all the time. I really recommend this course. | is a great course with good | Method | I liked the assignments and I | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very solid introduction to machine learning. The instructor is very knowledgeable and does a good job of explaining the intuition of the methods. I would recommend watching every video (even if you are already familiar with some of the methods watch the video anyway. You may see it from another perspective). | of explaining the intuition of the | Method | I would recommend watching every video | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very solid introduction to machine learning. The instructor is very knowledgeable and does a good job of explaining the intuition of the methods. I would recommend watching every video (even if you are already familiar with some of the methods watch the video anyway. You may see it from another perspective). | already familiar with some of the | Method | watch the video anyway. You may | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course for learning the basics of Octave/Matlab and machine learning. The math is accessible and you really understand the "pick a cost function and minimize it" methodology. | a cost function and minimize it" | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The concepts are explained masterfully with a focus on understanding rather than high-level mathematics which most of these topics invariably deal with. Plus the exercises give a real feel for the practical questions that Machine Learning can solve and the method that practitioners use most often. | Machine Learning can solve and the | Method | that practitioners use most often. | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good introduction and overview of up-to-date machine learning methods. Andrew had simple and clear explanations and the exercises were challenging, not overwhelming, well-structured, and allowed the students to apply the relevant theory without being burdened by creating their own test programs or mastering the programming/scripting language. | and overview of up-to-date machine learning | Method | Andrew had simple and clear explanations | Positive | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great teacher, amazing examples, fantastic methods, are what the course supplies. Thanks much! | Great teacher, amazing examples, fantastic | Method | are what the course supplies. Thanks | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course to learn the actual machine learning methods | to learn the actual machine learning | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a survey course in Machine Learning which isn't afraid to get seriously in-depth with the detailed math and coding techniques underlying popular ML topics like logistic regression, neural networks, and SVMs. Andrew Ng also spends considerable time on applications and methods for determining if your learner is robust. It is a very challenging course, both conceptually and with the assignments. The assignments are very difficult and will require considerable time and effort. Previous experience with Matlab/Octave is helpful. In terms of math, I think at least one course in Linear Algebra should be prerequisite as the use of vector and matrix operations abound in this class. A good understanding of the programming concept of vectorization is also very helpful...if you don't already understand it...you will after you get through this course. A special thanks to Tom Mosher, one of the class mentors....his help and advice was very helpful in completing the course. | spends considerable time on applications and | Method | for determining if your learner is | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great overall experience. The lectures are top notch. The section on backward propagation in neural nets was particularly well done. You spend most of the homeworks getting Octave implementations to work based on provided scaffolding code. This is a good method, but it does mean that you spend time with few examples than you might expect, as you must write the implementations at a fairly low level. The upside is that you end up with a deeper understanding of the methods than you might get from, say, using high-level commands in R. Thank you mister Ng for making this great opportunity to learn machine learning for free. | scaffolding code. This is a good | Method | but it does mean that you | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great overall experience. The lectures are top notch. The section on backward propagation in neural nets was particularly well done. You spend most of the homeworks getting Octave implementations to work based on provided scaffolding code. This is a good method, but it does mean that you spend time with few examples than you might expect, as you must write the implementations at a fairly low level. The upside is that you end up with a deeper understanding of the methods than you might get from, say, using high-level commands in R. Thank you mister Ng for making this great opportunity to learn machine learning for free. | with a deeper understanding of the | Method | than you might get from, say, | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis | Method | inferences that could be derived, final | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | One of the best courses that exist, to my knowledge, as far as the educational methods that it uses and the environment that it creates for non-computationally oriented fellows that want to really get started in the field of machine learning... | knowledge, as far as the educational | Method | that it uses and the environment | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | BRILLIANT !!!! Andrew Ng is a great teacher. He has really taken a great approach to presenting this course. I learned a whole lot and grasped and retained more only because of his teaching style and methods. This course is a MUST, if you're looking to pick up on Machine Learning concepts or break in to the Data Science industry. | because of his teaching style and | Method | This course is a MUST, if | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng did a great job with this course. He covers algorithms and others tools to do machine learning. Being new to machine learning I believe I got an idea what it is about and how to apply the methods. | about and how to apply the | Method | | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Andrew is a great teacher. Teaches every algorithm and every method used in machine learning fundamentally. No logical jumps. Really concise and clear, thank you Andrew and thank you Coursera! | teacher. Teaches every algorithm and every | Method | used in machine learning fundamentally. No | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Assignments are too easy. I am not able to practice optimization methods implementation (Like - fmincg etc). Video lectures are good but at some places lack the explanation (Like how do we get the cost function of neuralnets). Still very helpful. | am not able to practice optimization | Method | implementation (Like - fmincg etc). Video | Negative | 0.81 | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Overall, an awesome course. It covers many useful algorithms and approaches to machine learning, and presents the material in an easy to understand manner. The assignments really reinforce the material and give you a chance to try out the lessons learned in the lectures. The only downside to this course is that it doesn't cover some of the more theoretical aspects of machine learning. After participating in this course, it is natural to ask "what questions can't we solve with machine learning?" "What defines something as machine learnable?", or "What are the mathematics behind this method?" These are small problems with an otherwise amazing course. In fact, I would say that this course is more useful than quite a few you can take an accredited university. | What are the mathematics behind this | Method | " These are small problems with | Negative | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent professor! Excellent classes! Outstanding methodology for online on-demand couse... strongly recommended! | Excellent professor! Excellent classes! Outstanding | Method | for online on-demand couse. . . | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I like the practical approach Professor Ng took toward teaching the different concepts in this course. The focus on real-life applications rather than proving the theories behind each method is great for working professionals, and I am now empowered with different ideas to try out at work! | than proving the theories behind each | Method | is great for working professionals, and | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Challenging and demanding, but also excellently prepared course. Complex topics well explained, useful practical examples, getting you as far as to be able to solve your own problems using the methods presented. | solve your own problems using the | Method | presented. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The subject of the course concerns how to estimate parameters to make predictions about data and to classify data. The lectures are very clear and the examples are well chosen. The mentor, Tom Mosher, is also diligent, clear, and patient. In addition to the subject matter itself, it is interesting to learn that these are some of the key methods used in Silicon Valley. If you have a strong mathematical background, some of the early lectures are too slow. (On the flip side, for someone with less background, the course is self-contained.) However, by about lecture 3, I was glad I stuck with it. Instructors might consider adding some no-credit quizzes to help people "place out" of certain videos. If you can get past the assignment on backprojection for neural networks, you're home free! | these are some of the key | Method | used in Silicon Valley. If you | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great course for revolution in advance machine learning, I am attempting it 2nd time very useful content about Machine Learning and great teaching methodology | about Machine Learning and great teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was by far the best class I have had so far on Coursera. I feel that I now have a really good understanding of linear and logistic regression and neural networks as well as the other learning methods that we touched upon. I thought that the quizzes and assignments were very appropriate and helped me to further cement my understanding that I gained through watching the video. Professor Ang explains the material very clearly. I always walked away feeling that any questions I might have were answered completely in the videos or in the discussions. I would highly recommend this class to anyone who wants to have a good understanding of Machine Learning. | as well as the other learning | Method | that we touched upon. I thought | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course has really helped gaining practical and applicable knowledge in Machine Learning algorithms. I particularly appreciate the course delivery by Prof. Andrew Ng where not only he takes us through the algorithm but also help build the intuition of the methodology for us to customize the algoriths as well for our specific problems. Thanks so much professor Andrew Ng for sharing your knowledge! | help build the intuition of the | Method | for us to customize the algoriths | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting, though it does not dive deep in the maths. Concepts like ensemble methods are missing. | in the maths. Concepts like ensemble | Method | are missing. | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, practical and easily understandable course. I've learned new numerical methods in spite of that I've finished a semester long numerical methods course at the uni. | understandable course. I've learned new numerical | Method | in spite of that I've finished | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, practical and easily understandable course. I've learned new numerical methods in spite of that I've finished a semester long numerical methods course at the uni. | I've finished a semester long numerical | Method | course at the uni. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| GukyRC_jEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | A superb course to take. Well presented, informative and logically structured. It was interesting for me as I learned about the US health care system and the way adoption and future use of the EHR is driven. I found it fascinating to compare my experience with the UK's NHS Quality and Outcomes Framework with the US methods. I was also surprised to find that Implied Consent is not defined, particularly with referrals. I would highly recommend this course. | and Outcomes Framework with the US | Method | I was also surprised to find | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | Clearly presented.course which focuses only on the principal question and themes of each of the 4 philosophies. I found it extremely valuable as it structured in a logical way these issues and also related themt modern life. My only criticism relates to the grading method of the final assignment 0 or 1 is far too simplistic. | only criticism relates to the grading | Method | of the final assignment 0 or | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | great!!! In this lecture, I learn how to write R code to analyze data with Machine learning methods. | to analyze data with Machine learning | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The mathematics in this course are at a high level (similar to Statistical Inference) - and are presented at a pace that is challenging without significant background in the field. There is little guidance presented on the methods required. It is recommended that students source out plenty of support material (intro to statistical inference and similar). | is little guidance presented on the | Method | required. It is recommended that students | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Compared to previous two courses in specialization this one is far worse - it is more of excursion into used methods than actual learning using any of mentioned methods in enough detail to be able to do meaningful analyses. | is more of excursion into used | Method | than actual learning using any of | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Compared to previous two courses in specialization this one is far worse - it is more of excursion into used methods than actual learning using any of mentioned methods in enough detail to be able to do meaningful analyses. | actual learning using any of mentioned | Method | in enough detail to be able | Negative | 0.89 | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Pretty good overview of how to build some types of machine learning models through the caret library in R, but not much in terms of the theoretical underpinnings or why one method is better than the other or where it is most suitable. | the theoretical underpinnings or why one | Method | is better than the other or | Negative | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression | Method | and structural equation modeling. The latter | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | R packages (like the fancier tree | Method | that were not available when I | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| HcZv2HHtEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | All in all,the idea of the topic is good and informative, however honestly speaking I didnt like teaching method of professors. The video volume was very quite. | honestly speaking I didnt like teaching | Method | of professors. The video volume was | Negative | 0.93 | 3.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good teaching methods. Convenient for starting to get to know GIS software and sharing your map data. | Good teaching | Method | Convenient for starting to get to | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Absolutely loved this course. Despite a very seemingly 'casual' method of instruction, the content surely keeps the student on their toes. There is just oodles of stuff to learn in this Course! You'll leave enlightened in the Arduino Space! Great course, I recommend it to everyone who wants to learn how the shields work, internet connectivity with Arduino and even basics of Arduino. | course. Despite a very seemingly 'casual' | Method | of instruction, the content surely keeps | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | As a learning course the final project was specification-less. they should ask for something specific and explained well they should test conecpts not asking for whatever idea you have, apply what you learned I think this is an old school method. | think this is an old school | Method | | Positive | 0.73 | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Exceptional teaching method!!!Looking forward for great courses like these!! | Exceptional teaching | Method | ! ! Looking forward for great | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Sharing a satisfied amount of knowledge, overall very good. The HTML videos were excellent. The one thing missing is the methodology on how someone starts to think and makes JavaScript code that delivers a solution to a problem. How do we do our approach? Flow charts would really help on this matter. | The one thing missing is the | Method | on how someone starts to think | Negative | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | HTML and CSS were stellar explanations. Matt really has a knack for adding humour to his lecture that kept me engaged and helped me understand as well. Cheers. The JS portion though was rough. I felt like Marko has an incredible amount of knowledge but the method of the lecturers, content, and layout was hard to grasp on a first-time go. I had to re-watch every lecturer in the JS and I still am having problems...It's obviously a difficult language though and I'm honestly not sure if there actually IS an easier way to teach it. Marko's enthusiasm really showed though, so it helped keep me coming back for more punishment~ Great job all around to everyone! Really good beginner course. | incredible amount of knowledge but the | Method | of the lecturers, content, and layout | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | Excellent course that taught many methods to develop engagning activities with different ages in a museum setting. Excellent reading list and theory. | Excellent course that taught many | Method | to develop engagning activities with different | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| Hr9lByyfEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Well thought through course with strong methods and tools | Well thought through course with strong | Method | and tools | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great teaching methodology - although the test are a bit too centered on number crunching and not reasoning. (a lot of number crunching and no room for little numerical mistake although reasoning is good) | Great teaching | Method | - although the test are a | Positive | 0.97 | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great lessons and tests. Although I already knew quite a lot of this material, I still really learned a lot about why certain methods work the way they do. I would have loved to get some sort of a certificate though. | learned a lot about why certain | Method | work the way they do. I | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Really frustrating method of teaching. Class is incredibly slow and does way, way too much simple addition, subtraction, and multiplication to prove extremely basic points for a calculus course. | Really frustrating | Method | of teaching. Class is incredibly slow | Negative | 0.68 | 1.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | One of the well organized with best Teachers, best teaching methods, and easy to follow course. | organized with best Teachers, best teaching | Method | and easy to follow course. | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Prof Fowler has a really effective and engaging method of presenting the course in an accessible manner. The visual aids are used to good effect to illustrate each topic, whilst the module tests really help to cement the knowledge, occasionally boosted by being able to re-watch the relevant lecture should there be any sticking points. | has a really effective and engaging | Method | of presenting the course in an | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It was a really fun course; I have started to understand how the power rule, etc can be used to differentiate functions and also learning new methods to integrate (Riemann Sum) and differentiate! Sadly, I wish there were extra questions that you could attempt to consolidate your knowledge! | differentiate functions and also learning new | Method | to integrate (Riemann Sum) and differentiate! | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Excellent teaching methodology ! I really like the enthusiasm of the instructor Dr. Jim Fowler. Although I had prior experience with calculus, this course has helped clear some of the basics and made me look at Calculus from a totally different perspective. Thanks to Coursera & The OSU for developing this exciting course ! I highly recommend it . | Excellent teaching | Method | ! I really like the enthusiasm | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Really nicely explained, learned so many useful methods for data analysis in R. The dimensionr reduction and principal component analyses walkthroughs were a little tricky for a newbie in those areas though. | nicely explained, learned so many useful | Method | for data analysis in R. The | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | some swirl tests (4,5) don't work because of parameter method in qplot function. This parameter is not realy existed in this function now | 5) don't work because of parameter | Method | in qplot function. This parameter is | Negative | 0.88 | 2.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | A worthwhile course that breaks down methods for doing initial data analysis to get a rough feel of the data. It provides enough useful information about the 3 plotting systems in R and how they differ to allow the student to do sufficient exploration on his or her own. | A worthwhile course that breaks down | Method | for doing initial data analysis to | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course: The instructor, the method, the process for evaluation, everything was good, fun and interesting. Thanks for sharing it! | Very good course: The instructor, the | Method | the process for evaluation, everything was | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good visual material accompanied by excellent written supplement that allowed us to follow the recorded portion of the course. Interesting exercises and great methodology that allow students to review and provide feedback to others. | the course. Interesting exercises and great | Method | that allow students to review and | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This was a great course I loved it. I especially love the imagemaking, using methods other than just the computer. | I especially love the imagemaking, using | Method | other than just the computer. | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| iCIGe_T6EeS-1yIAC7MN4w | Thanks for overview of experimental methods and references to relevant articles! "Complete the essay" quizzes looks like a joke | Thanks for overview of experimental | Method | and references to relevant articles! " | Positive | 0.64 | 4.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | Bioinformatics Methods II provides a broad overview of several bioinformatics techniques for co-expression analyses. Lessons & Labs are as interesting and exciting as the ones of Bioinformatics Methods I - which I suggest to attend as well. Again, this "training on the job" approach is useful for achieving familiarity with this rich and many-sided subject. Thanks professor Provart & team for this!!! | Bioinformatics | Method | II provides a broad overview of | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | Bioinformatics Methods II provides a broad overview of several bioinformatics techniques for co-expression analyses. Lessons & Labs are as interesting and exciting as the ones of Bioinformatics Methods I - which I suggest to attend as well. Again, this "training on the job" approach is useful for achieving familiarity with this rich and many-sided subject. Thanks professor Provart & team for this!!! | exciting as the ones of Bioinformatics | Method | I - which I suggest to | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | It was an awesome course. I learned a lot from this course. The method of teaching was quite simple and student friendly. I just want to say that if you will avail more solved examples then it will be quite helpful for us. | a lot from this course. The | Method | of teaching was quite simple and | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Professor Erickson explains both the mathematical and physical definitions of all converter equations. His methods enable you to tackle more complicated problems while maintaining a physical insight (not just playing with the math). Very good derivation of how to include losses and calculate the efficiency of a dc-dc converter. | definitions of all converter equations. His | Method | enable you to tackle more complicated | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | I am enjoying the course. I appreciate the method the professor is using for the lectures. I am taking the course for the challenge of learning something new as I have not studied chemistry since my first year of college in 1958. | enjoying the course. I appreciate the | Method | the professor is using for the | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I really loved the teaching method, fluid and in tune with any artist`s budding creativity! | I really loved the teaching | Method | fluid and in tune with any | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | An awesome course that not only teach us about nutrition but also many different recipes....The teaching method and the teacher used is the best!!!Really enjoyed.. :) | recipes. . . . The teaching | Method | and the teacher used is the | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I found this course very much valuable for kids as well as other elder people. The teaching method was highly impressive and Dr. Maya Adam really inspired me. I wanted to give 5 stars but I found few things missing, such as food recipes were without quantity of items (especially in written format), gardening was described in a very short format (I felt that it required little bit more detail), market visits could be a very healthy and informative section, some experts advice & suggestion (including famous chefs), some discussion over food available and prepared in hotels/restaurants & also visits over there. Over all it's really a good course and I would definitely recommend to others. My all the best wishes to Dr. Maya Adam such a great work and hope see more from her. Thank you. Regards, Shoukat Shadat Ali | as other elder people. The teaching | Method | was highly impressive and Dr. Maya | Positive | 0.87 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A pretty solid course, though there does appear to be a degree of cognitive bias regarding certain farming methods. | of cognitive bias regarding certain farming | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was an amazing experience for me. The teaching method was an absolute pleasure for me as a leaner. Great graphics and short lessons worked perfectly for me. It was as if I just didn't want the course to finish. Well I guess what I am trying to say is, I not only learned so much, but I enjoyed the learning process. It was all smooth for me. Keep the strategy up! Many | amazing experience for me. The teaching | Method | was an absolute pleasure for me | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Great course, great methodology and great teacher, it's all I have to say. It's easy for you to learn and to visualize where to apply in real life the knowledges acquired here. | Great course, great | Method | and great teacher, it's all I | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Doing this course 'Initiating and Planning Projects' gives learners, practical skills on Project management based on PMBOK methodology which is framed by PMI based on contributions from experienced professionals in the field. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp, clear and lucid style of communicating ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | on Project management based on PMBOK | Method | which is framed by PMI based | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | concepts were very good but teaching method/material must improve...some of the materials and methods used are too unstable to be useful for professional use...more work should be done by instructors to separate the 'reliable' concepts/info from 'interesting to know but not ready for mass use' | . some of the materials and | Method | used are too unstable to be | Negative | 0.66 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of the most used tools and methods used by Data Scientists. | of the most used tools and | Method | used by Data Scientists. | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is well structured but for investigation methods purposes some subjects should be improved and more clear considering that not all of us have deep statistics knowledge. | is well structured but for investigation | Method | purposes some subjects should be improved | Positive | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good introduction to data science. However, without prior knowledge of statistics, programming, and research methods the course would be fairly difficult to follow. | knowledge of statistics, programming, and research | Method | the course would be fairly difficult | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Super basic introduction. I liked the last section reviewing data science methods and conceptual ideas. | the last section reviewing data science | Method | and conceptual ideas. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The Data Scientist’s Toolbox is a great way to dip into Data Science and the methodology behind it. The course is very general, and makes an effort to cover the bigger scope of things without delving deep in any. More than anything, it's a great way to learn the components and uses of data science and set a framework for all that will be coming after. The materials are very well laid-out and almost feel like attending college classes. The visuals and slides are a little dry, but the pace is lively enough to maintain momentum at all times. | dip into Data Science and the | Method | behind it. The course is very | Positive | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The part of explaining Predictive and Inferential Analysis is confusing. I think it won't hurt to give some more specific examples and methods used in each case. Both types of analyses involve sampling, so I think it is necessary to keep it clear how that sample can be used to either "infer" or "predict". | give some more specific examples and | Method | used in each case. Both types | Positive | 0.82 | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course. Learnt a more structured approach to categorising statistical methods. Much of the rest of the content was a bit basic, though probably useful to fill in any knowledge gaps pre-course. | more structured approach to categorising statistical | Method | Much of the rest of the | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | It gives you a very strong foundation. His explanation, and teaching methods are superb, I would be really happy if he was my teacher at university. Yaakov for president! | strong foundation. His explanation, and teaching | Method | are superb, I would be really | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| J0igZhzvEeSGAiIACxMEjA | Exceptional course! I would have enjoyed several more weeks. Dr. Onuf's style and methods in presenting the material made it possible to understand Jefferson in a way I have not understood him before. Wonderful teacher. Thank you. | more weeks. Dr. Onuf's style and | Method | in presenting the material made it | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Much better Courses are available for free on udacity and edx. this is only a money making course. concepts used are very old. nothing new in this course. One can dwell in PID controllers for life, its a huge are and the way its used here is totally ancient. its just some ancient methods in new quadcopters. | totally ancient. its just some ancient | Method | in new quadcopters. | Negative | 0.83 | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | the course and the lessons are really interesting and the professor is explaining really well. Especially nice are all the videos demonstrating what have been done so far. Problem are the assignments: -all the assignments are about controlling a quadrotor, but a matlab code 95% done is already provided and most of the times the only thing requested is to spend days in find (randomly) the correct values for the controller gains; -the last assignment is again partly about (randomly) looking for gain values and partly about generating a trajectory as a piecewise 7th order polynomial, where the method for creating such thing is only mentioned in the assignment pdf and with wrong conditions. Even with the correct conditions, with a previous knowledge of numerical methods you can go through it, but otherwise it takes quite some time; -the grade is not set properly.. you either take 0points or the maximum, meaning that for just passing the assignment you have the same difficulty as getting full marks.. if you arrive (after days of trial and error) to the point of passing the assignment, then you can easily get full grade with small changes.. which makes no sense; -the explanatory pdf for the assignments or the provided codes some times contain errors, and I don't understand why they are not fixed considering that this course is already the second time that was provided; -the assignments are fully based on matlab and to actually understand something it is required quite a deep knowledge of how to use it.. I work daily with matlab and had some difficulties in following what it is done. If somebody is new to matlab, it will be quite difficult to do even the easier tasks; -the evaluation function for the last assignment is extremely slow.. it took me 40minutes to evaluate the results.. and considering the many iterations usually required for (randomly) finding the gains this really doesn't help. Summarising I am quite happy about this course and glad to have done it, but please fix the many problems in the assignments. I have taken many courses online in different platforms and this was so far the most time consuming one.. | piecewise 7th order polynomial, where the | Method | for creating such thing is only | Positive | 0.77 | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | the course and the lessons are really interesting and the professor is explaining really well. Especially nice are all the videos demonstrating what have been done so far. Problem are the assignments: -all the assignments are about controlling a quadrotor, but a matlab code 95% done is already provided and most of the times the only thing requested is to spend days in find (randomly) the correct values for the controller gains; -the last assignment is again partly about (randomly) looking for gain values and partly about generating a trajectory as a piecewise 7th order polynomial, where the method for creating such thing is only mentioned in the assignment pdf and with wrong conditions. Even with the correct conditions, with a previous knowledge of numerical methods you can go through it, but otherwise it takes quite some time; -the grade is not set properly.. you either take 0points or the maximum, meaning that for just passing the assignment you have the same difficulty as getting full marks.. if you arrive (after days of trial and error) to the point of passing the assignment, then you can easily get full grade with small changes.. which makes no sense; -the explanatory pdf for the assignments or the provided codes some times contain errors, and I don't understand why they are not fixed considering that this course is already the second time that was provided; -the assignments are fully based on matlab and to actually understand something it is required quite a deep knowledge of how to use it.. I work daily with matlab and had some difficulties in following what it is done. If somebody is new to matlab, it will be quite difficult to do even the easier tasks; -the evaluation function for the last assignment is extremely slow.. it took me 40minutes to evaluate the results.. and considering the many iterations usually required for (randomly) finding the gains this really doesn't help. Summarising I am quite happy about this course and glad to have done it, but please fix the many problems in the assignments. I have taken many courses online in different platforms and this was so far the most time consuming one.. | with a previous knowledge of numerical | Method | you can go through it, but | Negative | 0.79 | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course had an excellent syllabus, but left much to be desired in the methodology adopted for teaching. There was very low involvement of the TA in the discussion forums and there should have been more material given to help bridge the gap between pre requisites and the course content. | much to be desired in the | Method | adopted for teaching. There was very | Negative | 0.7 | 4.0 |
| jnoxprrzEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Very intersting. Very enjoyable to learn. Great teacher and teaching methods. Fair quizzes. | to learn. Great teacher and teaching | Method | Fair quizzes. | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| jnoxprrzEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Awesome course. Dr Jennifer Groh uses a wonderful methodology along the modules overlaying clear language, really funny moments, examples in drawings, laboratory and exterior experiments all of them helping to reveal for us the fascinating theme of Brain and Space. Thank you very much for this opportunity. | Dr Jennifer Groh uses a wonderful | Method | along the modules overlaying clear language, | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | a great teacher with thoughtful method! | a great teacher with thoughtful | Method | | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Very Nice teaching method........Easy to follow........Thank you Georgia Institute of Technology | Very Nice teaching | Method | . . . . . . | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The mentor is really good, he is great at explaining what he means and gives you a few great methods for writing. The peers were also great. | and gives you a few great | Method | for writing. The peers were also | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good method of passing the knoledge and valuable material and tecnics to start or develop your writing skills, great course, love it! | Very good | Method | of passing the knoledge and valuable | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| K6ho2ngdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I have enjoyed every second of the five-part creative writing specialization. These courses have made me reassess my writing practices, they have allowed me to hone my skills as both a writer and working on the editing process. The course materials were brilliantly developed to support the aspiring writer and the knowledge and writing tips are of a very high caliber. Each guest writer and tutor have given great insight into the writing process and how every writer is different, everybody has their own methods of working. Superb and challenging. | is different, everybody has their own | Method | of working. Superb and challenging. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Excellent course, very interesting and with a very good teching method. | and with a very good teching | Method | | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well taught, informative and clearly delivered. I loved the real-life examples that hit home the concepts and the thorough, scientific approach to each lesson. It gave me an interesting foundation in the psychological reasons behind certain effective social media methods. | reasons behind certain effective social media | Method | | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | clear lessons with solid, practical methodology. Really learning a lot. | clear lessons with solid, practical | Method | Really learning a lot. | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | This course offers an excellent introduction to methods that can be used to focus the creative process, with intention and purpose. It forced me to think about exactly what it is I wish to achieve with the music I make, how I want it to sound, and to what end, and also gave some basic information on how to achieve certain aesthetics in a recording. It is a well-structured course that encourages engagement with other participants, and exposes you to the ideas of other creative people around the globe. | course offers an excellent introduction to | Method | that can be used to focus | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | Clearly great content and multimedia in this course, and the story-telling method was very much enjoyable. 5 out of 5! | in this course, and the story-telling | Method | was very much enjoyable. 5 out | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | We are given inadequate information in the videos, and no other resources, to write a program. Required to use methods not covered in the course. | write a program. Required to use | Method | not covered in the course. | Negative | 0.86 | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Teaching method is great ! | Teaching | Method | is great ! | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, the methods and pace was not good enough. I wonder if those new to these topics learnt anything | A good course, the | Method | and pace was not good enough. | Negative | 0.99 | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great instructor with great presentation methods that make learning course content simple and straight forward. Would recommend to anyone needing to get web basics into their toolbox of skills. | Great instructor with great presentation | Method | that make learning course content simple | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, with useful examples and methodology! | Good course, with useful examples and | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | While the lectures were good, one of the mentors wasn't profesional at all, she was nasty, though the other one was very fine. But my chief complaint is the terrible method (in creative writing classes only ?) of using peer reviews to pass the class. I had a non-English-speaking person NOT pass me, a former English teacher, for no other reason than he misread the assignment. So I had to resubmit. I don't know who finally passed me, I think the peer review process is a shambles, and it lets Coursera personnel out of the process of doing grading and opens a can of worms with an incompetent peer reviewer having the power to not pass me. I don't think I will be taking creative writing classes again at Coursera, as going through that broken peer review process and having one mentor being off the wall just wasn't worth my time and anxiety. | my chief complaint is the terrible | Method | (in creative writing classes only ? | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I really enjoyed the course. I always wanted to do a course in poetry, but this is my first opportunity to do so. The course was well put together, the information explanations and the lecturers method of delivery kept you awake and attentive. He was quite dramatic but it was essential and effective. Thanks for putting it together, I learned alot and feel more confident about my poetry writing. | the information explanations and the lecturers | Method | of delivery kept you awake and | Negative | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Very detailed and helpful. It helped me decide for my present method. | helped me decide for my present | Method | | Positive | 0.74 | 4.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Learning how to create a scheduling page that suited my life instead of learning how to cope with a generic off-the-shelf planner has made all the difference. My method is still evolving but it's evolving rather than crashing and burning and trying to start all over again. I've been using the tips learned in this course for more than a year and a half. | has made all the difference. My | Method | is still evolving but it's evolving | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | After many years of trying different methods, this has been the first time a planning system is explained ot me in a way I can truly implement and benefit from it. I am ADHD and the concepts of time and linear thinking are VERY difficult for me. This course split the concepts into chunks i could actually manage and then put all the tools together in a process I love to follow. The videos are clear, well organized, the assignments are applicable immediately. Love it and recommend it to anybody looking for better time management, productivity, and balance. Whether a teacher or not | After many years of trying different | Method | this has been the first time | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Professor Dan Boneh has created a comprehensive and throughly concise material for understanding the very foundation and method of operation of cryptography fundamentals. I loved learning under him and look towards doing it in the future also. | for understanding the very foundation and | Method | of operation of cryptography fundamentals. I | Positive | 0.77 | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Great tips and mind tools to enhance your learning. Has a wonderful methodology and great analogies for better understanding . Recommend profoundly this course that may help in any forward and complex subject needed. | enhance your learning. Has a wonderful | Method | and great analogies for better understanding | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Dear Dra. Barbara, I'm really glad for has been done this course. The content is extremely helpful and your methodology show me the true way of learning. | content is extremely helpful and your | Method | show me the true way of | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This course has introduced me to different and useful methods of solving problems that I am excited to try applying on different issues. Thank you for providing it. | introduced me to different and useful | Method | of solving problems that I am | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This course contains interesting points about group decision methods and change management. I think it could be deeper, but I liked it overall. | contains interesting points about group decision | Method | and change management. I think it | Positive | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This is an excellent course. It covers how data helps in taking decisions. It also talks about group decision making and gives the pros and cons of each of the methods and finally it explains how to manage change in an organization. All in all a great course. | and cons of each of the | Method | and finally it explains how to | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Doesn't go much further then common sense. Introduces terms for concepts you probably know, just didn't know it's a concept. The lecturer is terrible. His stories, or i guess metaphors that are supposed to help you understand and remember things are aweful. He takes way too long to get the point across. Some helpful things are mentioned. Gives you the ability to distiguish problem solving methods, so you may use them as required. Nonetheless, mostly wasted my time watching this. | the ability to distiguish problem solving | Method | so you may use them as | Negative | 0.72 | 2.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Excellent content, in-depth compared to may other MOOCs. The instructors have organized the lectures very well and shown some useful and practical methods that can be implemented at various stages. | and shown some useful and practical | Method | that can be implemented at various | Positive | 0.75 | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Great course! The content was produced very well. The course offers the slides as PDFs & makes other materials available for download as well. The information was extremely good & informative. I say this as someone who has taken multiple business classes already on entrepreneurship, as well as reading several books, & listening to many podcasts. The only things I would suggest as improvements are to in some of the optional content interviews at the end of the course it appears that they used a stereo recording which seems great but is a pain when you listen with headphones. You'll have only one headphone speaker with any sound. Also it would be great if the optional audio recordings at the end would be available for download or some other method. | available for download or some other | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | The teaching methods and pace were quite fine but it lacked a bit of media presentation pizzazz. It was definitely sufficient but could've been a little better production quality-wise. The professor had an amiable vibe and definitely seem to be a master of his field. I enjoyed it and plan to resume. | The teaching | Method | and pace were quite fine but | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mqcQFm6vEeWJ-wrnmCvZZw | Very good course. It has transformed my approach to career development. Before I was not sure about how to manage my career and I was trying to learn a lot of skills without thinking about how to use them. This course has provided me with the tools and methodology that I need to be more strategic and focused in my career management. | provided me with the tools and | Method | that I need to be more | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I'm not a conversational learner. I like to learn via the puzzle method. | like to learn via the puzzle | Method | | Positive | 0.73 | 1.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Great method and instructor. I am going to keep going with learning Mandarin. Very pleased with the content and structure of the course. | Great | Method | and instructor. I am going to | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Very frustrating and disappointing experience. The lectures were hard to follow on many levels: 1) The enunciation was unclear and subtitles were often of-the-point, plus they covered-up the code lines that were being discussed. 2) The lecturer often failed to explain logical constructs that were being used, despite the fact that the course should have been understandable with no R cran/Bioconductor experience. 3) The method arguments were either not explained, or very vaguely mentioned, which means applying them to new situations was unnecessarily complicated. 4) No feedback at all was offered from course organisers/reps to anyone, even after complains in discussion forum about quiz questions. 5) No feedback for solving the questions/correct answers even after the deadline. 6) Quiz questions required methods and logical constructs that were not explained/used/mentioned in the lectures. One quiz lacked background information of what data needed to be used (the info was available in the previous version of the course). Some quiz questions were biologically inaccurate i.e. confusing genes/transcripts/exons. | no R cran/Bioconductor experience. 3) The | Method | arguments were either not explained, or | Negative | 0.97 | 1.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Very frustrating and disappointing experience. The lectures were hard to follow on many levels: 1) The enunciation was unclear and subtitles were often of-the-point, plus they covered-up the code lines that were being discussed. 2) The lecturer often failed to explain logical constructs that were being used, despite the fact that the course should have been understandable with no R cran/Bioconductor experience. 3) The method arguments were either not explained, or very vaguely mentioned, which means applying them to new situations was unnecessarily complicated. 4) No feedback at all was offered from course organisers/reps to anyone, even after complains in discussion forum about quiz questions. 5) No feedback for solving the questions/correct answers even after the deadline. 6) Quiz questions required methods and logical constructs that were not explained/used/mentioned in the lectures. One quiz lacked background information of what data needed to be used (the info was available in the previous version of the course). Some quiz questions were biologically inaccurate i.e. confusing genes/transcripts/exons. | the deadline. 6) Quiz questions required | Method | and logical constructs that were not | Negative | 0.91 | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great course covering Regression Machine Learning. Gives a great introduction to this topic. Teaching the methods using a case study yields for great illustrations of the concepts. | introduction to this topic. Teaching the | Method | using a case study yields for | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Nice explanation of concepts, and very helpful with getting started on the programming assignments. The algorithms are explained well in pseudo code, and the instructor does a good job at explaining why they work the way they do. The math is not very challenging, so I never felt frustrated. I only wish there was not such an emphasis on Graphlab. Although they do allow you to use other methods to finish the assignments, it feels as though more attention is given to explaining how Graphlab works instead of standard, free python libraries. I understand that they're trying to push a product, but I don't want to pay for something I'll only be using for a few courses. More attention should be given to sklearn. | do allow you to use other | Method | to finish the assignments, it feels | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I felt that the course was detailed and contained significant in-depth study about regression techniques. The assignments were well designed, starting from a single step and eventually enabling the candidate to be able to write the complete methods on his own. | be able to write the complete | Method | on his own. | Positive | 0.67 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course serves as a baseline for the most common regression and parameter tuning methods. | most common regression and parameter tuning | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This Machine Learning class and the rest of the Machine Learning series from the University of Washington is the best material on the subject matter. What really sets this course and series apart is the case-base methodology as well as in-depth technical subject matter. Specifically, the step through coding of the algorithms provides key insight that is seriously missed in other classes even in traditional academic settings. I highly encourage the authors and other Coursera publishers to continue to publish more educational material in the same framework. | and series apart is the case-base | Method | as well as in-depth technical subject | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | gets way too in-depth with the math behind regression, to the point that it deters from the learning process. was hoping to learn better methods of interpreting or enacting regression, not the inner workings of the algorithms. assignments got overly complex with confusing instructions. there are definitely some leaps made in the assumptions of what students' python capabilities are. vague instructions caused more frustration than desire to continue learning. will continue in the specialization, but will not hesitate to drop out if instruction continues like this. very disappointed. | process. was hoping to learn better | Method | of interpreting or enacting regression, not | Negative | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | An excellent and quite extensive foray into regression analyses from single-variable linear regression to nearest-neighbor and kernel regression techniques, including how to use gradient vs. coordinate descent for optimization and proper L1 and L2 regularization methods. The lecture slides have some questionable pedagogical and aesthetic qualities, and they could use some more polish from someone who specializes in teaching presentation methods, but the meat of the course comes from its quizzes and programming assignments, which are well split between practical use (via Graphlab Create and SFrame) and a nuts-and-bolts assignment that have you implement these methods from scratch. An extremely valuable course for someone who wants to use these for a data science application but also wants to understand the mathematics and statistics behind them to an appreciable degree. | and proper L1 and L2 regularization | Method | The lecture slides have some questionable | Negative | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | An excellent and quite extensive foray into regression analyses from single-variable linear regression to nearest-neighbor and kernel regression techniques, including how to use gradient vs. coordinate descent for optimization and proper L1 and L2 regularization methods. The lecture slides have some questionable pedagogical and aesthetic qualities, and they could use some more polish from someone who specializes in teaching presentation methods, but the meat of the course comes from its quizzes and programming assignments, which are well split between practical use (via Graphlab Create and SFrame) and a nuts-and-bolts assignment that have you implement these methods from scratch. An extremely valuable course for someone who wants to use these for a data science application but also wants to understand the mathematics and statistics behind them to an appreciable degree. | someone who specializes in teaching presentation | Method | but the meat of the course | Negative | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | An excellent and quite extensive foray into regression analyses from single-variable linear regression to nearest-neighbor and kernel regression techniques, including how to use gradient vs. coordinate descent for optimization and proper L1 and L2 regularization methods. The lecture slides have some questionable pedagogical and aesthetic qualities, and they could use some more polish from someone who specializes in teaching presentation methods, but the meat of the course comes from its quizzes and programming assignments, which are well split between practical use (via Graphlab Create and SFrame) and a nuts-and-bolts assignment that have you implement these methods from scratch. An extremely valuable course for someone who wants to use these for a data science application but also wants to understand the mathematics and statistics behind them to an appreciable degree. | assignment that have you implement these | Method | from scratch. An extremely valuable course | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent presentation of fundamental concepts and good overview of some specific methods. | and good overview of some specific | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Fantastic course in regression, taught with the mathematical rigor necessary to really understand (not just use) the concepts. The instructors both do an amazing job introducing the concepts piece by piece in a logical and easy to follow manner. In addition, several modules have *optional* in depth derivations of key formulae for those who want to understand the mathematical underpinnings of the regression methods | the mathematical underpinnings of the regression | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | To start with, I have been dedicating time to improve my understanding and depth in statistics and calculus. The reason is that, I am totally impressed by the lecture videos. The videos are detail, precise and covers enough depth. It has helped me to correlate the statistical concepts and application areas and rekindled my interest to go back to learn and strengthen my basics. I like the contents that its not a overdose of many mathematical equations. Appreciate the pains taken by the expert professors in explaining every detail possible to make the course more interesting. Appreciate the mention about the topics not covered in the course. My suggestion is to include a seperate section for each course with a list of reference books, topics and weblinks of material to increase our depth and breadth of technical understanding of the statistical methods. Many Thanks to Emily Fox and Carles Guestrin for their time and efforts in making this specialization course, and of course providing us with the free license to use Dato for learning purposes. | of technical understanding of the statistical | Method | Many Thanks to Emily Fox and | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course offer many aspects like graphic comparison or detail math explanation help us understand more easily what a model or method means. The teacher have great effort on material design. | more easily what a model or | Method | means. The teacher have great effort | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I found this an excellent introduction to the topic with a good mix of well presented material and practical application using the IPython notebooks. I would love to have the course finish with a project where we apply the learned methods to a different data set. | project where we apply the learned | Method | to a different data set. | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Got more insight to the terms and the methods used in Regression models | insight to the terms and the | Method | used in Regression models | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very useful for well understanding basic algorithm method! | useful for well understanding basic algorithm | Method | | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Def a useful skills to have when starting to interview for jobs. This is a hard course to teach to begin with. I found the lectures really boring, too long, hard to understand and just not really motivated well. I think the homework problem are good, but they are very time consuming. You need to use various methods to find edges cases and though that might be a good skill to have as well, it's just too much to get done in one week and somewhat frustrating when you're only stuck in one test case. I think this could be an excellent course with a few modification on the slides and adding more motivations and making shorter homework problems that focuses on the main part of the material for that as oppose to things we've already covered in the previous week. At the moment, I don't think I'll continue this specialization the way it's designed. | consuming. You need to use various | Method | to find edges cases and though | Positive | 0.94 | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Excellent coverage of algorithmic techniques in this course, with very accessible introductions to such fundamental topics as the Master Method, greedy algorithm design, and dynamic programming. This class hits the sweet spot for people who find Tim Roughgarden's Analysis and Design of Algorithms course too intense and hand-wavy, but who still want mathematically-sound, proof-based discussion of algorithmic techniques. (Listen to Roughgarden's drive-by treatment of Karatsuba's algorithm in his first week of lectures, and you will appreciate Neil Rhodes' coverage of the same algorithm all the more.) You get an introduction to a lot of "greatest hits" from Computer Science, but at a level where you come away understanding the technique. The problem sets start off with fairly easy exercises, just enough to reinforce your understanding, and progress up to exercises that will prove challenging indeed to newcomers. You will get a lot out of careful study of this course. I look forward to continuing in this specialization. | such fundamental topics as the Master | Method | greedy algorithm design, and dynamic programming. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course starts very promising, but it gets worse week after week, culminating on a barely understandable week about dynamic programming. That’s when I gave up and decided to write this review instead, with just one assignment missing to complete the course. Some of the teachers aren’t native english speakers, which is fine, but their english is very hard to understand. I found myself having to watch some portions of the videos over and over again in order to understand what was being said. I tried reading the transcripts instead, but the they’re even worse! It seems that they were automatically generated from the videos, thus suffering with the poor pronunciation. The teachers use mathematical sophistication that feels unnecessary, but to be fair, they do mention it on the FAQ as part of the necessary background. However, even though it’s an online course, they barely use any teaching method besides very raw slides, some dry mathematical proofs and someone speaking about the content. The only resources offered to help learning are a few open source visualizations. I expected much more. The only good aspect from this course are the assignment checkers, which allow you to write your solutions in multiple languages. I deeply regret the money and time I spent on this course. | course, they barely use any teaching | Method | besides very raw slides, some dry | Neutral | 0.50 | 2.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | The videos did cover the basic theories behind all the methods for portfolio management however they were just basic theories with no explanation on how to practically implement them and then asking us who only understand the theories from the videos to suddenly try to solve the calculation quizzes especially those excel calculations without any practice on how to implement them beforehand. Besides the videos only showed the formulas with no example at all! Very disappointed with the course... This course is not recommended for those who have zero or little experience in the field.. | the basic theories behind all the | Method | for portfolio management however they were | Negative | 0.69 | 2.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This class was a great refresher and continuation of the OOP methodology. | refresher and continuation of the OOP | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very comprehensive course, that digs deep into the intricate details of Java - for beginners. Although the third module was challenging and had scope of improvement by explaining briefly what all the objects and methods meant, I managed to comprehend it. | briefly what all the objects and | Method | meant, I managed to comprehend it. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Peer reviews was unfair. It's must be any methods to exclude inadequate learners from reviewing. Blacklists is only one way to stop them now. | was unfair. It's must be any | Method | to exclude inadequate learners from reviewing. | Negative | 0.71 | 3.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great introduction to OOP with Java. This is not a pure theoretical course, neither a entirely practical course... It is both, so the instructors present the material with a good balance between theory and practice. Part of your assignment tasks is to explore on Java classes and learn how to use their methods (functions) in your own programs, which gives you a taste of a daily programmer job. The end of course project stimulates your creativity! Nonetheless, this course will be challenging for someone who has not been exposed to any OOP concepts before. Make sure to practice a lot and go to the discussion forums, which are a great resource for help, at any moment you need it. | and learn how to use their | Method | (functions) in your own programs, which | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent teachers and their teaching methods. | Excellent teachers and their teaching | Method | | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I learnt some good tricks on this course, it came at the this time for what I was doing at work. I recommend this course as it covers most of the basics, and encapsulated difficult parts, all you do call a method to do something. | parts, all you do call a | Method | to do something. | Negative | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a good course to take. As we learn OOP in a better understandable way. Instructors explain the concepts well. Also I always like working with maps and as this course assignments are based on map data, plotting data on real maps it like it more. But it would be great if the course have taught to execute the same code through java jar. As using Papplet via eclipse is easy but how to use the same code via computer terminal is quite tricky as we don't find any main method in our code. | as we don't find any main | Method | in our code. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Seems like the quality of this specialization goes down with every course. The instructor is not showing us the way we should think about developing programs in NodeJS, but he insists on using PowerPoint slides to show us how to code! It's 2016, and there are way better mediums for communicating with your students. Simply copying and pasting code and explaining what every line does is not the right way of teaching any concept, especially when you are dealing with a new technology. For the start, the instructor can actually type the code and explain what goes through his mind during each step. That way anyone can follow his problem solving methods and benefit from the course. I had to take other online courses on Code School and Pluralsight just to understand what's going on, and later come back to finish the homework. | anyone can follow his problem solving | Method | and benefit from the course. I | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | I think some estimation methods are not really realistic | I think some estimation | Method | are not really realistic | Negative | 0.72 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I loved this instructor! She is very knowledgeable and articulates the terms and methods well. | knowledgeable and articulates the terms and | Method | well. | Negative | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | When I started this course, my only experience with HTML was <b> bold</b>, <i> italic</i>, and <u>underline</u>. After this course I have a much clearer understanding of what HTML is, and how it works, and I am able to now use it to a much greater extent than I was before. The professor did an excellent job of explaining most things, but I did find that on occasion I had to stop the video and go back several times to understand what she'd said or to take notes, despite having slowed the video down as much as possible. (In my opinion, one should be able to slow the video down more than is currently possible, especially for those for whom English is not their native tongue.) With me, it wasn't that I didn't understand what she said so much as I didn't have time to take in what she meant before she'd gone on to something else. I understand that Coursera is able to do what it does because of its method, which is basically independent study; one watches the videos, and reads whatever resources are listed, and goes on from there. If there is a question, it is not the professor in the videos that the question is asked of, but people hired as "teaching aides". These are the people (other than fellow students) who answer your questions, and they do not always answer in a 'timely' fashion. While this method works well for some people, I am quite sure there are others unable to learn with this method, especially if the subject turns out to be a more complicated, intensive one. Some people need to have a little more than just videos which they can only repeat over and over with the same information, hoping to learn something new from it. The only other thing I have a problem with is the lack of oversight/security. There's no way of knowing if the person who 'earns' a certificate is the person they claim to be, or if they earned the scores given. All in all, I think Coursera is a great tool, and well worth the low prices charged; I am sure there are plenty of courses still remaining (after the 'purge') that I would love to take. | what it does because of its | Method | which is basically independent study; one | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | When I started this course, my only experience with HTML was <b> bold</b>, <i> italic</i>, and <u>underline</u>. After this course I have a much clearer understanding of what HTML is, and how it works, and I am able to now use it to a much greater extent than I was before. The professor did an excellent job of explaining most things, but I did find that on occasion I had to stop the video and go back several times to understand what she'd said or to take notes, despite having slowed the video down as much as possible. (In my opinion, one should be able to slow the video down more than is currently possible, especially for those for whom English is not their native tongue.) With me, it wasn't that I didn't understand what she said so much as I didn't have time to take in what she meant before she'd gone on to something else. I understand that Coursera is able to do what it does because of its method, which is basically independent study; one watches the videos, and reads whatever resources are listed, and goes on from there. If there is a question, it is not the professor in the videos that the question is asked of, but people hired as "teaching aides". These are the people (other than fellow students) who answer your questions, and they do not always answer in a 'timely' fashion. While this method works well for some people, I am quite sure there are others unable to learn with this method, especially if the subject turns out to be a more complicated, intensive one. Some people need to have a little more than just videos which they can only repeat over and over with the same information, hoping to learn something new from it. The only other thing I have a problem with is the lack of oversight/security. There's no way of knowing if the person who 'earns' a certificate is the person they claim to be, or if they earned the scores given. All in all, I think Coursera is a great tool, and well worth the low prices charged; I am sure there are plenty of courses still remaining (after the 'purge') that I would love to take. | in a 'timely' fashion. While this | Method | works well for some people, I | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | When I started this course, my only experience with HTML was <b> bold</b>, <i> italic</i>, and <u>underline</u>. After this course I have a much clearer understanding of what HTML is, and how it works, and I am able to now use it to a much greater extent than I was before. The professor did an excellent job of explaining most things, but I did find that on occasion I had to stop the video and go back several times to understand what she'd said or to take notes, despite having slowed the video down as much as possible. (In my opinion, one should be able to slow the video down more than is currently possible, especially for those for whom English is not their native tongue.) With me, it wasn't that I didn't understand what she said so much as I didn't have time to take in what she meant before she'd gone on to something else. I understand that Coursera is able to do what it does because of its method, which is basically independent study; one watches the videos, and reads whatever resources are listed, and goes on from there. If there is a question, it is not the professor in the videos that the question is asked of, but people hired as "teaching aides". These are the people (other than fellow students) who answer your questions, and they do not always answer in a 'timely' fashion. While this method works well for some people, I am quite sure there are others unable to learn with this method, especially if the subject turns out to be a more complicated, intensive one. Some people need to have a little more than just videos which they can only repeat over and over with the same information, hoping to learn something new from it. The only other thing I have a problem with is the lack of oversight/security. There's no way of knowing if the person who 'earns' a certificate is the person they claim to be, or if they earned the scores given. All in all, I think Coursera is a great tool, and well worth the low prices charged; I am sure there are plenty of courses still remaining (after the 'purge') that I would love to take. | others unable to learn with this | Method | especially if the subject turns out | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Video Lectures are good. Quiz taking method is Great. Liked. Thanks for the course. | Video Lectures are good. Quiz taking | Method | is Great. Liked. Thanks for the | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent teacher and method. Really enjoy it! Thank you very much. | Excellent teacher and | Method | Really enjoy it! Thank you very | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| NuH3s9uFEeWoKQ6POrXqdQ | Great course, I enjoyed learning Chinese in this method. The videos were straightforward. The pronunciation was clear enough to understand without and difficultly. I would recommend this course. | I enjoyed learning Chinese in this | Method | The videos were straightforward. The pronunciation | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Absoultely Astoundishing. I will highlight the best points: There is a companion textbook. This really helps to consolidate knowledge and sear for new information, although I should say that the tutorials are much complete. There are tutorial notes given to the students. This is crucial. If one was to organize all the course content from just watching the videos it would be impossible. The tutorial notes give a great start for your own knowledge structuring. This course is no light thing. My impression from some of other MOOC sites is that they are much superficial. Their courses seem a good joke at simulating college level education. Medical neuroscience is not like that. You should expect a standard college level neuroscience course. Professor White is amazing. When you think he couldn't surprise you with his teaching methods, he plays music for you! It is better than going to classes. Trust me. I had a neuroscience course in university and I couldn't stad attending classes. I wouldn't have passed wasn't it for Medical Neuroscience. The course subject is just fascinating. Have you ever wondered that there are sensory labeled lines? Did you know that you cannot feel pain unless you have a specific receptor for it? Well, I don't know about you, but for me, that is simply magic. This course will really make you have smarter conversations. Have you wondered launching a neuroscience topic during your date? "Well, did you know that no one really precisely knows how we can see? yes, because what your eyes "see" is just a pattern of light, and it is inverted horizontally and laterally! This is simply the best course I have ever attended What are you waiting for? | couldn't surprise you with his teaching | Method | he plays music for you! It | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | An awesome course, very interesting and the teaching method was awesome. Loved the drawings presented, it made it a lot easier. Hope to be studying at this University in the future. | course, very interesting and the teaching | Method | was awesome. Loved the drawings presented, | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | While course uses a genie method for presentation the content, Quizzes are just made to accomplish one goal: to make sure you have memorized every small detail haven said in the course. Even if someone memorizes the details like specific names and dates, for how long he/she is going to keep it in mind? 2 days? On week? | While course uses a genie | Method | for presentation the content, Quizzes are | Positive | 0.68 | 2.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | Great material, great methodology and lots of knowledge to apply in a communicators daily work. | Great material, great | Method | and lots of knowledge to apply | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This is a highly recommended course and the content is second to no other on Coursera at the time of this review. I have taken all of the courses in the series from Copenhagen Business School, as well as nearly all other business management courses offered for other institutions. This specific course on Strategic Management is the single most informative and current material of all of the options. It does not answer every question or address every concept you would need to know to run a major corporation, but it is a fantastic overview of past and present methods of business strategy, and is of value to any business minded individual. I highly recommend this course and the entire series from CBS. Enjoy! | fantastic overview of past and present | Method | of business strategy, and is of | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | A very interesting and useful course. I took it as a supplement to my studies at my B-school. It has helped clarify many concepts and given me applicable tools. Loved the lectures,quizzes and the Capstone project. I highly recommend this course to anyone who wants to learn about Strategy at its core. Thank you Professor Robert Austin! Your teaching methods are very different from what I have here in India, The examples you gave throughout the course were very apt and aided my greatly. | you Professor Robert Austin! Your teaching | Method | are very different from what I | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | This course is very helpful in giving students a survey in the major thoughts of the modern Western world. The fact that it is carried out by Wesleyan University, a premier Liberal Arts College in the United States, ensures its quality and seminar-style coherence. I find it particularly interesting when each chapeter is started by an assigned reading task with the instructor's videos following, which is a rather typical method by which American collegiates learn humanities. | following, which is a rather typical | Method | by which American collegiates learn humanities. | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| OFscqWDPEeWFnw4rjmRYKQ | This course has been created with love. Teachers are fun to watch. It covers several creativity strategies and methods.. A lot of inspiring videos and supplemental study material is included. Weeks will pass fast. You won't regret taking this course. | It covers several creativity strategies and | Method | . A lot of inspiring videos | Positive | 0.92 | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The teacher is really passionate, everything's very clear and easy to understand. It's full of all the basic knowledge one needs to know about qualitative research methods to begin working with them. | needs to know about qualitative research | Method | to begin working with them. | Negative | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I found this to be an excellent course for not only developing my knowledge of qualitative research methods, but also expanding it. Having done a previous course in University I was surprised at the amount of new information this course had. The peer reviews felt fair and were always informative, I have never been exposed to such global critique! | developing my knowledge of qualitative research | Method | but also expanding it. Having done | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Excellent introduction to qualitative research methods. Loved the lecturers enthusiastic style and quirky sense of humour. Very engaging. Assessments were practical and supported the course material. | Excellent introduction to qualitative research | Method | Loved the lecturers enthusiastic style and | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I really enjoyed the course, I learned a lot and I am planning to do more focused reading on qualitative methods especially analysis. Gerban's presentations are excellent, I wish all tutors are like him, they are organised, clear and easy to understand. | do more focused reading on qualitative | Method | especially analysis. Gerban's presentations are excellent, | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Engaging and broad-based course on qualitative research methods. Real world assignments were required, so there was a considerable commitment, which of course led to a sound learning experience. Generally I prefer courses with multiple lecturers, but the lecturer here was entertaining and interesting to watch, and very committed to ensuring that we learnt from the course. Also I noted that when students raised issues about the quizzes or assignments they were dealt with. Thanks Coursera and University of Amsterdam. | and broad-based course on qualitative research | Method | Real world assignments were required, so | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I am a strictly Quantitative Scientist so I was not sure if I would like this course or enjoy it. Surprisingly, I both liked it and enjoyed it. It was interesting learning about the Qualitative Methods that I had no idea about. The professor is very animated and keeps your interest throughout the course. I now have an appreciation for Qualitative Research Methods instead of looking down my nose at them. Great Course with a great professor. | was interesting learning about the Qualitative | Method | that I had no idea about. | Negative | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I am a strictly Quantitative Scientist so I was not sure if I would like this course or enjoy it. Surprisingly, I both liked it and enjoyed it. It was interesting learning about the Qualitative Methods that I had no idea about. The professor is very animated and keeps your interest throughout the course. I now have an appreciation for Qualitative Research Methods instead of looking down my nose at them. Great Course with a great professor. | have an appreciation for Qualitative Research | Method | instead of looking down my nose | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great intro to concepts and critical assessment of mainstream business methods. Some of the concepts introduced need more discussion on drawbacks or common abuse by designers. | and critical assessment of mainstream business | Method | Some of the concepts introduced need | Positive | 0.66 | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Real methods for Design Engineering | Real | Method | for Design Engineering | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good course, valuable information, great peer review method, outstanding teacher. I strongly recommend this course, and advice you to practice the video assignments. | course, valuable information, great peer review | Method | outstanding teacher. I strongly recommend this | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A simplified course that targets areas of business writing which most of us tend to oversee. In this era of digitalisation and information overload, this back to basics method was really refreshing. | information overload, this back to basics | Method | was really refreshing. | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| O_jWsQCnEeWKrCIAC49PHA | I like this course and recommend others to take this gives broader ideas and teaching techniques and methods. | broader ideas and teaching techniques and | Method | | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Just like the previous class on these Specialization. The teaching method and the dynamics of the class is very enjoyable. Finally, I am learning Python without the suffering. Excellent course, excellent teacher, excellent material. | class on these Specialization. The teaching | Method | and the dynamics of the class | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Method of teaching is excellent! | | Method | of teaching is excellent! | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It could review the use of tuples/lists on variables like the settings variables on Django. Also, it could review more complex operations over the mentioned structures, like the list insert() method. | mentioned structures, like the list insert() | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great methods to explain the basics of Python | Great | Method | to explain the basics of Python | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent teaching method. I really understood each and every topic. Thankyou Dr.Chuck! :') | Excellent teaching | Method | I really understood each and every | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | time. Good exercises to practice. The | Method | of teaching is encouraging and not | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | 2nd course with Dr Charles. I find his courses to be very informative and his teaching method is very helpful in understanding the topics fast. excited to complete the remaining items in the specialization and if Dr Charles has any other courses, i will for sure take it.... would love to have an advanced python programming class with Dr C | be very informative and his teaching | Method | is very helpful in understanding the | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Fantastic course for learning and implementing data structures in Python. I now feel like I have a healthy grasp as to how to scrub, analyze and implement data through various methods in Python. | analyze and implement data through various | Method | in Python. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Once again a great add on to the previous course. Things are starting to get nice and icky with methods and properties. Also some interesting concepts. Well done with the training material ! | to get nice and icky with | Method | and properties. Also some interesting concepts. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course to learn about python data structures in file, string, list, dictionary and tuples. It start from solving a problem with string, then move on to list, dict and tuple gradually by revisiting the same problem again and how to use the more advanced method we learn along the way. | how to use the more advanced | Method | we learn along the way. | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome course, maybe I'm not giving myself enough time to digest one topic before jumping to another as I needed to refer past topic often, open sourced pdf version of book helped a lot. I wanted to know if it is possible to generated dictionary from two seperate list, and it is possible! I was able to zip two list to form a list of tuple and then used dict() method to form a dict... Might not be important but I felt the course will come a full roung when these are covered. | of tuple and then used dict() | Method | to form a dict. . . | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | At times instructions for problems are really vague. Every method should have comments or be test covered like it was in the first course. For example I had to spend some time, looking through the parser to discover that spaces in calculator expressions are mandatory. Technically it was in the description, but it was not clear at all and I was stuck with the idea that I'm doing something generally wrong so i had to write a whole test(that was kinda ad-hoc and not a good practice at all) to reach that tiny problem. Otherwise the course is really really great. It made me progress a lot in my scala skill, while keeping me interested in the problems and learning some new data structs ect. Keep up the good work! | for problems are really vague. Every | Method | should have comments or be test | Negative | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | This was a fantastic course! The teachers taught the material well and were entertaining in their teaching methods. I enjoyed that the lectures were easy to watch, and I appreciated all of the practice problems. | and were entertaining in their teaching | Method | I enjoyed that the lectures were | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| pkE92hJhEearKQowajWNkQ | I learned so much in so little time. I actually impressed a musician friend of mine when I rattled off and showed him all the chords I learned on the keyboard. I played a 12 bars blues riff on the keyboard, tracked it, and then played a melody and tracked that and made an mp3. I cannot say enough. If I ever have the honor of meeting the professor who taught this course I will tell him I learned more about music in 6 weeks with his superb methods of instruction than I ever did in other courses. I am trying to save up money so I can take an official Berklee online course. This course was awesome! It truly showed why Berklee is in a class by itself. | in 6 weeks with his superb | Method | of instruction than I ever did | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | By this lesson, I can more learn about communication skill and method to manage many other project. I think this lesson is the best to make people's project management skiil. Thank you for professor: | more learn about communication skill and | Method | to manage many other project. I | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Course covers the basics and key terminologies related to PMP. It will be useful to have a few numericals/assignments to calculate Duration/Time using different methods and the associated impact of cost. | numericals/assignments to calculate Duration/Time using different | Method | and the associated impact of cost. | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better. 1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display. 2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure. 3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy). 4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is trueowl@trueowl.com) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge. Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme. Thank you! | not a software itself but the | Method | using in the one. The methodology | Negative | 0.65 | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better. 1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display. 2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure. 3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy). 4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is trueowl@trueowl.com) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge. Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme. Thank you! | methodology using in the one. The | Method | is worth understanding, for sure. 3. | Positive | 0.81 | 3.0 |
| pSaP4p3ZEeW_wArffOXkOw | good learning method | good learning | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The course is very detailed. The theories and philosophy is supported by lot of research, talks by expert. The course is overall has lots to offer, the only improvement needed is on the aspect that it seems like a very theory driven and a serious course, the fun part is missing in it. The orator of the course has immense knowledge and does offer lot of take aways. I actually would have named the course as Scientific method & theories to achieve happiness. | have named the course as Scientific | Method | & theories to achieve happiness. | Positive | 0.82 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Awesome course! Scientifically backs lots of happiness enhancing tactics and techniques that you probably have heard of but might have overlooked or misunderstood. You get a practical methodology to head towards happiness confidently and efficiently. | or misunderstood. You get a practical | Method | to head towards happiness confidently and | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is a very complete course if you want to understand how happiness can be achieved in your daily life and practice different methods to internalize them. Definitively after taking this course, your view about happiness will be different, and if you were neglecting happiness in your life, you will have now a motive to prioritize it in your life. I want to congratulate Dr. Raj and the course's support team. The idea, research done, the video assembling, the quick tests, etc., are well engaged and create a great synergy throughout the course in favour of the student. This methodology helps a lot to internalize the ideas and it is so playful that despite you will have to work in the course, you will do it happy. | your daily life and practice different | Method | to internalize them. Definitively after taking | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is a very complete course if you want to understand how happiness can be achieved in your daily life and practice different methods to internalize them. Definitively after taking this course, your view about happiness will be different, and if you were neglecting happiness in your life, you will have now a motive to prioritize it in your life. I want to congratulate Dr. Raj and the course's support team. The idea, research done, the video assembling, the quick tests, etc., are well engaged and create a great synergy throughout the course in favour of the student. This methodology helps a lot to internalize the ideas and it is so playful that despite you will have to work in the course, you will do it happy. | in favour of the student. This | Method | helps a lot to internalize the | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great methodology by the teacher and very ludic videos | Great | Method | by the teacher and very ludic | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Jana Schaich Borg takes extra care to provide and share knowledge and methodology that is useful to any person who is keen on data analyst role to be competent in data exploration, analysis and presentation using Tableau data visualisation tool. I have learned and benefited greatly from such course. | to provide and share knowledge and | Method | that is useful to any person | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | I enjoyed the course. My background is mathematics, but not specifically statistics, though I do have a basic understanding of elementary frequentist statistics. My goal was to understand the fundamentals and uses of Bayesian statistics, having attempted that via a couple of textbooks without much success; this time, I got it! I do have some reservations about the course. Herbie Lee spent a huge amount of time deriving formulas and methods - a few gaps (either hand waving or 'leave it to the student to finish') would have been helpful, I think. This would leave more time for examples and applications. But the course was well worth my time and effort. | amount of time deriving formulas and | Method | - a few gaps (either hand | Negative | 0.89 | 4.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | A great introduction. I feel like I know a lot more about bayesian statistics now. But I do mostly feel like there is quite a bit I don't know, and while I passed, I feel like there is quite a bit more I need to do to really 'get it'. The professor recommended some books in a discussion forum and I'll be going through some of those next I am sure. I also feel, looking back, I should have had some additional math preparation before starting. The calculus was vaguely familiar but with the pace of the lectures, I felt occasionally lost. I would have found it helpful if there was a quick primer on calculus to know and review at the beginning of the course. All in all great course. Loved the presentation method. | all great course. Loved the presentation | Method | | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| QuMnnbfJEeSsbCIAC0gVBg | A very enjoyable course that shows art can be appreciated in many forms, people of all walks of life and ages enjoy online games and that you can be anything you want with a little imagination. The course videos are a series of discussions between the course tutor and his team of young enthusiasts. Its an unusual method and one I thought was lively and entertaining. | of young enthusiasts. Its an unusual | Method | and one I thought was lively | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| QUTOlO03EeSC-CIAC38Bjw | I like this course and recommend others to take this course gives broader ideas and teaching techniques and methods. | broader ideas and teaching techniques and | Method | | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | This course is very valuable and relevant (in current time). The course very elegantly brings design thinking, lean startup and Agile methodology together in one practice. | design thinking, lean startup and Agile | Method | together in one practice. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | This course does an excellent job of breaking down the components of design sprints, offering an actionable formula for those new to this method of experimentation. | formula for those new to this | Method | of experimentation. | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | I only did week one of the course and quit for the following reasons: Presentation of the content is too fast and provides little information among lots of noise. Most of what's said is generic keywords assembled in sentences that don't make much sense, or implies "common sense" evidences barely illustrated with vague figures and no sources to support them. It makes everything hard to follow for beginners and unconvincing for more advanced students. On top of that, I feel offended by the mysogynist examples and the underlying contradictory assumptions that designers outside of agile are basically incompetent while saying at the same time that they will just use methods they already know anyway. | time that they will just use | Method | they already know anyway. | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | This is a best class I joined in coursera whit high quality of sound and method of teaching tnx | whit high quality of sound and | Method | of teaching tnx | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | I am glad to learn this class, because the teacher is nice and talk the planing method easily. | is nice and talk the planing | Method | easily. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The assignments were hard, not because of the contents of the courser, but for understanding the context of the method being implemented (what each variable meant and how it was expressed). Also, there should be a range of submissions that could be right but having higher or lower scores depending of how long it took to find the path, or how long the path was to reach the goal. | for understanding the context of the | Method | being implemented (what each variable meant | Positive | 0.79 | 2.0 |
| raZNrgNGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Excellent course: Content, methodology, instructors, mates, everything! | Excellent course: Content, | Method | instructors, mates, everything! | Positive | 0.84 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Got me face to face with the details in financial statements and quick analyses through ratios and easy methods. An addition to your usual MBA class. | quick analyses through ratios and easy | Method | An addition to your usual MBA | Positive | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | The first 3 weeks demonstrate how to analyze financial performance based on accounting data taken from a company's reported income and investment decisions (10-K for example). The material is presented in an interesting manner with extensive use of Excel spreadsheets to demonstrate the calculation and application of common performance metrics and ratios. The test are challenging and interesting. I retook test I had passed because the information cover was interesting and the test provided an excellent learning opportunity. The fourth week deals with liking non-financial measures to financial performance. Within a typical organization, these parameters are often the ones employees most affect and are often measured against. The concepts and methods of evaluating presented with examples to demonstrate some of the problems with linking non-financial measures to financial performance. I will be able to use what I have learned from both of these classes in my current job. I evaluate current business strategies of my company against competitive business strategies. Since the competitive business strategies must be deduced from a combination of published information and reported financial performance, the first three weeks will be of greatest benefit in this aspect of my job. The last week will be of more benefit as I help business organization within my company develop their business strategies. | often measured against. The concepts and | Method | of evaluating presented with examples to | Positive | 0.74 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This course was very informative and can easily be used in any business setting. I can go an apply the methods learned in this course to any organization's financial statement to get a better idea of their financial performance. I really enjoyed in week 4 how the information learned in prior weeks can be tied to nonfinancial measures in developing a causal model to improve the performance of a company. | I can go an apply the | Method | learned in this course to any | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Definitely good course for those working in either accounting or analytics. It gave me new ideas on how to apply analytical methods. Interesting examples on how to identify number management and how analytics can help to set up non-financial metrics that drive financial outcomes. | ideas on how to apply analytical | Method | Interesting examples on how to identify | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Challenging course, a mixture of forensic and investigation method in accounting | a mixture of forensic and investigation | Method | in accounting | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RLshf_xsEeWa_RIigsB41Q | Great course. Interesting ideas and methods to make students be involved. I really liked the course. | Great course. Interesting ideas and | Method | to make students be involved. I | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | From my past experience, I know it’s not easy for people to take suggestions. But I still want to have a try this time. I had high hopes for this course, but I am quite disappointed. I think Dr. Peng needs to improve his teaching skills. 1. Good teaching is clear, concise, and right to the point. So please slow down, speak. Don’t mumble. 2. Programming is a practical skill. So the best method to learn programming is to use step-by-step demos. You can talk about a concept for 5 to 10 minutes but I still can’t get it. Use a demo and I can get it right away. 3. Don’t just try to cover the materials so you think you have done the teaching, try to understand how your students learn and make sure they really get it. 4. If you haven’t covered some concept, don’t assume your students will understand it by magic. A good teacher can make the learning experience effortless and fun, a poor teacher makes it like a torture. | a practical skill. So the best | Method | to learn programming is to use | Positive | 0.89 | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I'm not saying R Programming has to be a gripping subject, but this course is pretty dull. The value of good teaching methods is often underrated in transferring knowledge. | dull. The value of good teaching | Method | is often underrated in transferring knowledge. | Positive | 0.82 | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great Course that introduces to R Programming. The level is high but not too difficult. It introduces to different Programming methods (new to me that come from Functional/Object-Oriented Programming Languages and environments) | difficult. It introduces to different Programming | Method | (new to me that come from | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Great course that really highlights, with science to support, the tangible benefits and methods of pursuing positive emotions and thoughts. Definitely not a "lovey dovey" course, but rather a rich scientific approach to understanding and applying positive emotions and thoughts. | to support, the tangible benefits and | Method | of pursuing positive emotions and thoughts. | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | An excellent introduction of Positive Psychology and a very generous delivery of the course. I would like to thank Dr. Barbara L. Fredrickson and her team because the coherent and friendly methodology. I have reinforce my ideas about the huge possibilities that authentic social connections could imply. Thank you all. . | team because the coherent and friendly | Method | I have reinforce my ideas about | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Its great course. Teaching method and techniques are so good. and so helpful to learn how to be positive in real life. | Its great course. Teaching | Method | and techniques are so good. and | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Well Done - I enjoyed these key concepts and how they were put across. Also the testing methods are pretty good. | were put across. Also the testing | Method | are pretty good. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome! Excellent methodology and contents! It goes to the point. Assignments are cool and help to understand the concepts. Perhaps, I found it a little bit easy, but this is also good because I can adapt my tight schedule to follow the deadlines while also remain motivated. ;-) | Awesome! Excellent | Method | and contents! It goes to the | Positive | 0.93 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Of all the lectures i have come across, (along with social psychology course of Wesleyan University), this one stands out, the profound depth and the sheer amount of information packaged, in simple language without simplifying, it's one of the best course i have come across, the instructor is very eloquent and articulate, its stimulating and interesting, i can't ask for more, thank you. P.S. though i listen to all the lectures, making notes - as i'm preparing for my psychology research methodology exam-, i'm a non-active participant. | i'm preparing for my psychology research | Method | exam-, i'm a non-active participant. | Negative | 0.68 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I have really learned and advanced my knowledge in quantitative methods. A big thanks to the course instructors and anyone who contributed to the success of this course. the perspicuous and lucid explanations in the videos lectures were so self explanatory. | and advanced my knowledge in quantitative | Method | A big thanks to the course | Positive | 0.96 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This course is very insightful, and a great introduction into Quantitative Methods and questionable research practices! The instructor is very insightful, and communicates the information in a highly digestible manner! Thank you! | and a great introduction into Quantitative | Method | and questionable research practices! The instructor | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | The course gave a really structured sense of what scientific method is and how scientific research shall be conducted. Assessing how the material is exposed to students - one of best courses here, imho. | really structured sense of what scientific | Method | is and how scientific research shall | Positive | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent organisation of the course! The content is also well thought and presented. i personally clarified many vague questions related to variables, measurements and research ethics. I did have the quantitative methods course at the university, in any case some blank spots were left, so this course was helpful. It is a useful course for revising, but I do not know how total beginners feel about it. If I were a beginner I would have some difficulties probably. It could relate to my personal "slowness" to grasp material like this. Thank you Annemarie! I really like your lecturing/teaching style. | ethics. I did have the quantitative | Method | course at the university, in any | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative | Method | in Social Science, which gives a | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | and 2 (insights into the scientific | Method | Nevertheless the rest of the weeks | Negative | 0.8 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | provide a great framework of Quantitative | Method | for a undergraduate student, who can | Positive | 0.86 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | with an excellent knowledge in quantitative | Method | for which I have to thank, | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I really enjoyed this course overall (and it was somewhat easy for me because I have some background in this already), but there were some technical issues especially regarding accessing assignments. It would be nice if there was a more robust group of volunteer tutors/teaching assistants or something to answer questions or deal with these technical issues, especially the final exam not working for a while for me and some other people. But, I enjoyed the illustrations (drawings) and cute examples, and also the lecturer did a pretty good job on camera. I would probably give this course a 4.5 if possible, but I am hesitant to give it a full 5 points because of the technical issues. Anyway I would recommend the course to someone who wants a survey of quantitative methods to prepare for future study. | who wants a survey of quantitative | Method | to prepare for future study. | Positive | 0.68 | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent introduction to quantitative Methods! | Excellent introduction to quantitative | Method | | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | An excellent course! Quantitative methods are very well explained, starting from philosophical roots. I liked a lot the challenging tasks and peer review principal. By checking my peers' work I was able to learn several times more than from just going through the videos and completing my own work. I enjoyed the whole design of the course, including the professional illustrations and graphic design work. Great thanks to the whole team! | An excellent course! Quantitative | Method | are very well explained, starting from | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Clear and great methodology! | Clear and great | Method | | Positive | 0.88 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Funny, useful, clear and serious too. I loved it. Many methodology courses before, but this one addresses also ethics on research practices and History of philosophy of science. simply I adored it and learned a lot. I strongly recommend it. It is so useful for my work and my everyday life. Interviews with real researchers and revising real publications helped me to conect contents with my inmediate reality.. Thanks to all team and congratulations for such a great course. | serious too. I loved it. Many | Method | courses before, but this one addresses | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent explanation and assessment methods. Dr Scholten is simply great. | Excellent explanation and assessment | Method | Dr Scholten is simply great. | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Really enriching course material and the method of explaining by Annemarie Zand Scholten. It gave me a good overview of the quantitative approach to contrast it with the qualitative approach i have been following at my workplace. The course material is very comprehensive and also the transcripts provided for each module. The detailed word to word transcripts really help to revise material while doing assignments and preparing for exams. The assignments really makes one think and helps to digest the course material in the process. The concepts and style of illustrations used in the video are also extremely helpful to understand the content heavy topic. The bonus video material provide the completeness due to the applied examples discussed in them. Overall a very satisfying learning experience! Great! | Really enriching course material and the | Method | of explaining by Annemarie Zand Scholten. | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I had taken 99% of the course last time, but didn't have time to do the assignments or complete it fully. I was pleased to see it was running again. I've followed many many many Courseras and this is by far the highest quality. Well done! What you did right? Illustrations. They perfectly capture the concept without distracting. They are amusing and just-the-right-degree-of-imperfect, which makes the course material feel approachable.The graphic design. The slightly messy, hand-written, crumpled paper background design is perfect. Not pretentious, not overly boring. Just that little touch of individualism and authenticity we need. This is a great way to avoid alienating your students, to keep a connection. Philosophy of science, history of science, research designs, etc. Despite having studied for a BSc, an MSc, and a scientific postgrad, I had to find out about these concepts through on-line courses and podcasts. I was really happy to see these neatly presented to me in a structured way in one spot in the context of a formal Research methods course. When covering these sections, you also did a great job at sticking to the important stuff. I am extremely impressed. In the reality of research, we get sucked in by the nitty gritty and forget about the big picture. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful framework behind the scientific method.You actually bothered spell-checking the transcript, particularly for proper names. I've had Courseras where the transcript seemed more like a onomatopeas than serious text. This is all I remember for now, all that's fresh off my mind, as am just up to week 2 right now, but I wanted to give you all a thumbs up for this great course you've wrapped up. I am seriously considering registering for the entire specialisation because of the quality of this course. | the context of a formal Research | Method | course. When covering these sections, you | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I had taken 99% of the course last time, but didn't have time to do the assignments or complete it fully. I was pleased to see it was running again. I've followed many many many Courseras and this is by far the highest quality. Well done! What you did right? Illustrations. They perfectly capture the concept without distracting. They are amusing and just-the-right-degree-of-imperfect, which makes the course material feel approachable.The graphic design. The slightly messy, hand-written, crumpled paper background design is perfect. Not pretentious, not overly boring. Just that little touch of individualism and authenticity we need. This is a great way to avoid alienating your students, to keep a connection. Philosophy of science, history of science, research designs, etc. Despite having studied for a BSc, an MSc, and a scientific postgrad, I had to find out about these concepts through on-line courses and podcasts. I was really happy to see these neatly presented to me in a structured way in one spot in the context of a formal Research methods course. When covering these sections, you also did a great job at sticking to the important stuff. I am extremely impressed. In the reality of research, we get sucked in by the nitty gritty and forget about the big picture. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful framework behind the scientific method.You actually bothered spell-checking the transcript, particularly for proper names. I've had Courseras where the transcript seemed more like a onomatopeas than serious text. This is all I remember for now, all that's fresh off my mind, as am just up to week 2 right now, but I wanted to give you all a thumbs up for this great course you've wrapped up. I am seriously considering registering for the entire specialisation because of the quality of this course. | wonderful, wonderful framework behind the scientific | Method | You actually bothered spell-checking the transcript, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This is a course that is well thought out, informative, descriptive, and enjoyable! I was excited to start each new week of Quantitative Methods, and to learn more about research methods! I definitely recommend this course to anyone who is interested in research, and this will help strengthen your basics in quantitative methods. I commend Prof. Annemarie Zand Scholten, and the rest of the team from UAmsterdam for bringing a wonderful course to the Coursera platform! I can't wait to start & finish the rest! | start each new week of Quantitative | Method | and to learn more about research | Positive | 0.87 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This is a course that is well thought out, informative, descriptive, and enjoyable! I was excited to start each new week of Quantitative Methods, and to learn more about research methods! I definitely recommend this course to anyone who is interested in research, and this will help strengthen your basics in quantitative methods. I commend Prof. Annemarie Zand Scholten, and the rest of the team from UAmsterdam for bringing a wonderful course to the Coursera platform! I can't wait to start & finish the rest! | and to learn more about research | Method | I definitely recommend this course to | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This is a course that is well thought out, informative, descriptive, and enjoyable! I was excited to start each new week of Quantitative Methods, and to learn more about research methods! I definitely recommend this course to anyone who is interested in research, and this will help strengthen your basics in quantitative methods. I commend Prof. Annemarie Zand Scholten, and the rest of the team from UAmsterdam for bringing a wonderful course to the Coursera platform! I can't wait to start & finish the rest! | help strengthen your basics in quantitative | Method | I commend Prof. Annemarie Zand Scholten, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I was very impressed with the perspective the course took. I had not seen the topic covered from the point of view of the harm to society poor methodology had. | of the harm to society poor | Method | had. | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I learned much more in this course than other courses about quantitative methods. It is clear and useful and inspiring. The quizzes are very good, because they are not only about konwledge,but also about whether you can apply the knowledge. And the interviews are very good too, which give us more information in different subjiects, or from different perspectives. But I feel the speaker's speaking speed is a little fast, and I hope that there will be exercise or quizzes in which we are given situation,and asked to come up with RQ, methods, analysis, etc. | course than other courses about quantitative | Method | It is clear and useful and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I learned much more in this course than other courses about quantitative methods. It is clear and useful and inspiring. The quizzes are very good, because they are not only about konwledge,but also about whether you can apply the knowledge. And the interviews are very good too, which give us more information in different subjiects, or from different perspectives. But I feel the speaker's speaking speed is a little fast, and I hope that there will be exercise or quizzes in which we are given situation,and asked to come up with RQ, methods, analysis, etc. | asked to come up with RQ, | Method | analysis, etc. | Negative | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Nicely explained with easy to understand examples. Quite hard for those who have never studied research methods. Very dense information. I found one or two questions in the weekly quiz that I couldn`t answer with the knowledge available in the videos. | those who have never studied research | Method | Very dense information. I found one | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| Rwzrl_9rEeS9ISIACxWDhA | Easy to follow up and clear lectures to understand dynamical modeling methods | clear lectures to understand dynamical modeling | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I must say that the Capstone Project was a good assignment. The issue is that the Peer Reviews were bad. I had to resubmit my assignment due to a student that choose to give me 0's when the other reviewers gave me 5's. There was also a bias to what each reviewer thought the capstone should cover so you had no idea which direction to update your work because the next reviewer may feel that the type of analysis you did was not Necessary. The course needs a specific Rubric and specific methods each person has to use in order to complete the assignment. For example, Must Use the Four Forces Model when evaluating Strategy. This way everyone knows what to expect and what to look for. Otherwise you can get a low grade on a great project because a Classmate thought you should have used another model so he gave you a 1 or 0 when the model you used demonstrated your knowledge. Capstones need to be monitored either by a student or assistant to protect against trolls that don't read your work and give you the lowest score. Otherwise the Course was great and the information was definitely well put together. The Peer Reviews brought my overall grade lower because I didn't get the High Mark I should have. | needs a specific Rubric and specific | Method | each person has to use in | Positive | 0.65 | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Getting more theoretical and less practical application on Excel application. Advanced Data interpretation and solving methods information can be included. | application. Advanced Data interpretation and solving | Method | information can be included. | Positive | 0.9 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Dense! Very Dense. Cool testing methods. | Dense! Very Dense. Cool testing | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Probably the worst class I have ever taken on Coursera. The teacher asked us to do tons of things without explaining how and used tons of complicated math formulas without explaining what they were, what they did, or when and how to use them. There were also actual incorrect answers in the videos on occasion, so that even if you did do things correctly, you would think you were wrong and be confused, and there were a lot of inconsistencies between the spreadsheets used in the videos and the methods used to solve things compared to the actual spreadsheets given to us, which makes things pretty impossible to learn. If you're more advanced, it may be easier to find and understand the differences between the video and the spreadsheets, but the whole point of this class is that it is for beginners. | used in the videos and the | Method | used to solve things compared to | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Amazing volume of topics covered and in a manner that is not overly complicated in terms of testing methodology, but still requires you to do the work. There are still several bugs with the course, test answers and instruction documents on the site, but clearly the course is new so hopefully that will be resolved in coming iterations of the class. | overly complicated in terms of testing | Method | but still requires you to do | Positive | 0.76 | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The method of the class is very useful, and teacher has a clear explanation and illustrated it very clearly. Thank you very much! | The | Method | of the class is very useful, | Positive | 0.7 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I teach quantitative methods in a Business course at University of São Paulo (Brazil). This is an excelent course with fundamentals and very usefull applications. | I teach quantitative | Method | in a Business course at University | Positive | 0.62 | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It has a lot of problems, including: Not so many lectures about excel itself - most of the time you will be watching videos about statistic methods. The lectures are very superficial, even though the quizzes and projects demand a lot of knowledge and time. The course seems to have a staff of one man: the professor of the course rarely replies (even though he did at the beginning of the session) and all the work seems to be done by his assistant, who tries his best, but ends up not coping with all the questions asked at the discussion forums. | will be watching videos about statistic | Method | The lectures are very superficial, even | Positive | 0.72 | 2.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | It's a good course if you want a general overview of the statistics of clinical research. Personally I was hoping for a little more depth in some of the statistical methods. Some links or suggested readings on the methods would be great as we move along the course. Overall a delightful course. Everything is clearly explained. Thank you Dr. Koppler! | depth in some of the statistical | Method | Some links or suggested readings on | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | It's a good course if you want a general overview of the statistics of clinical research. Personally I was hoping for a little more depth in some of the statistical methods. Some links or suggested readings on the methods would be great as we move along the course. Overall a delightful course. Everything is clearly explained. Thank you Dr. Koppler! | links or suggested readings on the | Method | would be great as we move | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | The videos and assignments for this course are new and interesting to me. The layout of tasks for each week is simple and easy to follow. I look forward to the course topics and interviews shown each week. Highly recommend this course for any teacher (and any professional) looking to adopt new methods and strategies to improve their work environment for themselves and others. | any professional) looking to adopt new | Method | and strategies to improve their work | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Excellent course with great insights on pedagogic methods and ways to handle this difficult scientific issues in the classroom | course with great insights on pedagogic | Method | and ways to handle this difficult | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Pros: Very good information and methods for running real life business models. The course provided the spreadsheet modules which allowed you to tinker around and learn them. I consider myself a power Excel user and I picked up some very good new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: I did Week 2 on my lunch break. Some questions on the quizzes were a bit vague. Probably need some working knowledge of Excel before taking this class. If you need to complete a lot of modeling with your job, this is a good course to pick up some skills. | Pros: Very good information and | Method | for running real life business models. | Positive | 0.96 | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Pros: Very good information and methods for running real life business models. The course provided the spreadsheet modules which allowed you to tinker around and learn them. I consider myself a power Excel user and I picked up some very good new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: I did Week 2 on my lunch break. Some questions on the quizzes were a bit vague. Probably need some working knowledge of Excel before taking this class. If you need to complete a lot of modeling with your job, this is a good course to pick up some skills. | up some very good new modeling | Method | Very concise. Cons: I did Week | Positive | 0.84 | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Few tools on Xls has been shown. More extensive and complex problem are required on use of Monte Carlo method | required on use of Monte Carlo | Method | | Positive | 0.63 | 3.0 |
| TCVXeIE6EeWJSwoTsapXpQ | Excellent Course and I highly recommended for those who want to have a professional career in Marketing. This course is open to anyone who wants to study International Marketing & Cross Industry Growth. I have a conviction the Marketing Analysis method in this course can be used by anyone to analyze Current Industries and Future Industries in any countries in the world. | have a conviction the Marketing Analysis | Method | in this course can be used | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Amazing course. I loved each lesson, the examples, the methodology, the teacher is Amazing!!! (Feel like we're friends now!) Very easy to follow exercises and achievable assignments. | loved each lesson, the examples, the | Method | the teacher is Amazing! ! ! | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Superb presentation of objective methods to approach negotiations, with exercises and | Superb presentation of objective | Method | to approach negotiations, with exercises and | Positive | 0.91 | 4.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Extraordinary Course with an excited lecturing team behind it! Have done some courses here, but none of them had so much content and sophisticated teaching methods and cool guests. The only star that's missing is that the system for finding negotiation partners could be optimized. Overall, was worth the time!!! | so much content and sophisticated teaching | Method | and cool guests. The only star | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great course! Thank you to all excellent teachers and classmates. Wonderful and practical methodology. | teachers and classmates. Wonderful and practical | Method | | Positive | 0.95 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I looked forward to each week's newly posted lectures and other content. This is a well-organized course, and one learns the various principles, including the more technical, without much effort. Also, Dr. Shane Dixon is a gifted teacher: his success at teaching this class proves that the teaching methods he presents yields successful learning indeed. A recommended course! | this class proves that the teaching | Method | he presents yields successful learning indeed. | Positive | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I recommend this course to all English teachers out there. Its very well explained and the methods shown are awesome. | Its very well explained and the | Method | shown are awesome. | Positive | 0.94 | 5.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | If this class is truly designed and welcomes beginners who have no knowledge in SEO as it is described in course introduction, assignment instructions should be provided with sample writings or rubrics. The writing assignment instruction reads,for example, "Identify headers, alt-text, and etc. and recommend how to improve them for optimization." Where does it say provide alt-text images for recommendation, make a tie to the recommendation, and list references for the images recommend, if not 3 points off? The lectures are short, doesn't show much details of what is expected for audit writing or analysis writing, but my 2 page analysis or audit is not enough because a thorough rubric expects to see this and that that is not even mentioned in instruction? It is a common sense that a writer has to be detail-oriented with recommendations? Then the course SHOULD not encourage SEO beginners who has never seen SEO audits or analysis paper. If not, assignment instruction should be listed thoroughly as rubric, so that a beginner SEO student can pass the writing and take it as a learning experiences. Endless flunking mal-grading system, is this Coursera's education method? | mal-grading system, is this Coursera's education | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | it really benefit me in my medical study but really you need to use more photo and educational method to clarify the subject | to use more photo and educational | Method | to clarify the subject | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | i learn here how to learn....really fabulous ,method of teaching ...i like both teachers and their way of speaking...i like course contents i.e. they are really arranged in professional manner....thank you DUKE university and its teachers for giving me such a important platform for learning......... | . . . really fabulous , | Method | of teaching . . . i | Positive | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | A good course for persons those who are employed as in security role to an any organisation. I appreciate the method of distance learning to all on online. Thanks. | an any organisation. I appreciate the | Method | of distance learning to all on | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Its very excellent teaching method. short time more information. | Its very excellent teaching | Method | short time more information. | Positive | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Extremely well done videos, Professor Sachs is articulate and clear. The videos are a bit lengthy 25 minutes each so this asks quite some time investment. The quiz are not easy, one must often look up charts and work with various statistical methods which were not always easy to manage - hence the 4 instead of 5. However this does force one into mining world organizations for data so overall it's a good learning process. It never fails to amaze me how much data we have collected globally and for so long! | charts and work with various statistical | Method | which were not always easy to | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | Some parts are needed more clarification. In other words, as a student of the course you need to go beyond the materials, since the materials are not self-sufficient. Specially about simulation methods. However, this is not the reason that I give the course 4 out of 5. The absence of any help from TAs, based on my experience, is the reason. I expected some official replies to my question while there are only a few question for each week of the course. | are not self-sufficient. Specially about simulation | Method | However, this is not the reason | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | I am eventually understanding statistical concepts, and realizing delicate differences between similar concepts and methods. | delicate differences between similar concepts and | Method | | Positive | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| UIi0kNpgEeWP9RIK11q74w | I enjoyed the course! It helped me organise information about methods in understanding complex systems. I would have definitely used some more detailed explanations about the model building process. Thank you very much for your kind interest and effort! | It helped me organise information about | Method | in understanding complex systems. I would | Positive | 0.93 | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | I really liked this course. The method used to teach is a simple and very functional way. The extra informations are too helpful and direct us to use the knowledge in our entrepreneurial activities. | I really liked this course. The | Method | used to teach is a simple | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I am a First year master in software engineering, but also a really curious "kid". In my search for interesting course related to astronomy I found this one. Although I am only half way through the course I state that this is the most compelling course I have taken on Coursera. Since I have more then some knowledge of scientific method, physics and other topics talked about in the course, but not as much in astronomy I find the course tailored for me. Especially taking into account that this course is in the right spot between popular knowledge and a little bit of science and engineering. Prof. Impley is excellent in explaining, even amazing at some points :) | more then some knowledge of scientific | Method | physics and other topics talked about | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Highly recommend. A clear, practical and well presented overview of the digital marketing field, with an emphasis on the equal playing field: Kevin makes an effort to provide free resources and tools so that any marketer may use the power of digital analytics unhampered by resource limitations. Which is a good thing because marketers often work with budget constraints. Convincing companies to invest more in marketing, which can be a long term strategy, may not always be easy. The course covers basic concepts, ethics, history as well as practical methods. A very useful addition to my marketing knowledge base, and toolbox. | ethics, history as well as practical | Method | A very useful addition to my | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Brilliantly well structured and pragmatically applicative course and with George Siedel Sir's teaching methods and guidance this course is a must take for aspiring professionals. | and with George Siedel Sir's teaching | Method | and guidance this course is a | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | As a administration professional, this course improved my career in global sphere of negotiation. Teaching keys, tactics and many others ways to achieve what the best alternative to conduct situations. I have no doubt about this awesome learning method. Thank you Coursera! Thank you Mr. George Siedel! | no doubt about this awesome learning | Method | Thank you Coursera! Thank you Mr. | Negative | 0.72 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent material and methods, i found the course extremely useful and practical | Excellent material and | Method | i found the course extremely useful | Positive | 0.78 | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course is very useful not only in commercial negotiation but also in daily affairs, such as dealing with office disputes through mediation or arbitration. I think those methods and concepts are quite pragmatic and really enlightened me a lot. | mediation or arbitration. I think those | Method | and concepts are quite pragmatic and | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | In progress actually, but I already approve the methods ! | actually, but I already approve the | Method | ! | Negative | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Really useful, though some of the ADR methods are not common in my city, still pretty good. | useful, though some of the ADR | Method | are not common in my city, | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The Course material and method of testing the understanding of the student needs to be improved. Despite the low quality of the quizzes, the course is very inspiring. The examples showed are very good and the lectures concentrated on teaching the underlying concept rather the Mathematics involved, which was refreshing. | The Course material and | Method | of testing the understanding of the | Positive | 0.96 | 3.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Ithink this course is unbelievably usefuland exciting but there weren't much information about educational method which was essentual,in my opinion. Thank you for your gripping course!!! | there weren't much information about educational | Method | which was essentual, in my opinion. | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | MoMA provides an organized, wonderful, and easy to understand course that is often called art appreciation. This course differs from ones I took in college, thankfully, by pleasantly presenting methods and themes for analyses. I'm downloading all the presentations so I can watch them again. | in college, thankfully, by pleasantly presenting | Method | and themes for analyses. I'm downloading | Positive | 0.89 | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Extensive coverage, engaging methodology. | Extensive coverage, engaging | Method | | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The material and resources are excellent. This was the first course I took without any mentors or tutors, so my participation in the discussions was very high. The following could be improved: inclusion of 'type="text/css"' in the <LINK> element; perils of alternating between background and background-color, especially in complicated, long style sheets; links to Coursera lecture videos and materials from the students' side rather than teacher's; explanation for Assignment One if the text-align:center style should be applied to the <a> or the <nav> element (I used the nav because I wanted the menu styled below the H1 heading, which is where the menu is positioned in later assignments). I'm deducting a star for Coursera's unwillingness to respond in its Community Help Forums to its method of assigning peer review assignments and for introducing new 'features' without notice to its educational content partners. I shouldn't have to engage a very busy professional to intercede on the students' behalf. Despite the large population of people taking the class (or is that cumulative? Coursera doesn't specify), about twenty students were active on the Discussion Forums. I felt we students were left on our own which is fine as long as we all are aware that the more peer reviews we do, the more we can learn from each other. I also did not like the error message in red 'There was an upload error. Please try again' coexisting with the 'Your assignment was submitted successfully!' in green on the same page. This confused lots of us and those of us who'd never used the transloadit.com script for uploading our assignments for peer-review would only know of transmission error if classmates flagged our submissions. I identified this as an issue and Coursera didn't respond because I'm only a lowlife deadbeat student. Never mind that there are people who've paid for the courses who encounter the same issues on this platform. | its Community Help Forums to its | Method | of assigning peer review assignments and | Positive | 0.69 | 4.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | for so many reasons, i think this experience is solidifying my opinion of this method of learning. | is solidifying my opinion of this | Method | of learning. | Positive | 0.64 | 5.0 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | Interesting course. It seems to me that we have been learning to play scales before going into music, or learning the names of the letters before learning to read. I wonder how much of all this word by word analysis is useful in real life, real arguing. It is interesting, but it also adds to the difficulty and prompts abandon of the course. Like having to memorize the Periodic Table of Elements before going into the wonders of Chemistry. The Suzuki Method in music or the Silabario Matte (to learn reading in Spanish, starting directly with basic words like "ojo"="eye"), show that starting with structural analysis it isn't the only way to learn things. | the wonders of Chemistry. The Suzuki | Method | in music or the Silabario Matte | Positive | 0.9 | 4.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | Great course understand research method and design! | Great course understand research | Method | and design! | Positive | 0.73 | 4.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | I thoroughly enjoyed this course. It was a narrowly-defined topic (Questionnaire Design) that was well-explored; this makes the course feel like you are actually learning something and does not feel overwhelming in the slightest. You feel you are actually learning a skill rather than a subject. Further, the professors were clear in their teaching methods. | professors were clear in their teaching | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | The material is a bit dry, but it's essential to writing effective survey questions. The course is well designed and easy to follow. Thanks to the University of Michigan and the University of Maryland for offering this interesting course. I hope to see additional offerings in survey research methods from these professors in the future. | see additional offerings in survey research | Method | from these professors in the future. | Positive | 0.79 | 4.0 |
| W9XMEny5EeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | classic content and methodology. Inspiring Lect'ures. | classic content and | Method | Inspiring Lect'ures. | Positive | 0.86 | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good method to learn this course, thanks! | good | Method | to learn this course, thanks! | Positive | 0.75 | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | to newbies to Meteor. js. Good | Method | regarding speed, content and presentation of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | I really appreciate Professor. Valérie Gauthier and her team for giving me the opportunity to learn Savoir-Relier methodology. I benefit a lot from the course and it shaped my way of thinking about myself and others. I strongly recommend taking the course, because it will provide a paradigm shift in leadership. | me the opportunity to learn Savoir-Relier | Method | I benefit a lot from the | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | I didn't finish the course yet, but I strongly recommend this course to anyone interested in these skills. Even if you cannot read the books proposed because you don't have time like me, it gives all the aspects you need to understand, and maybe learn that in the future. The quality of the videos and explanations are overwhelming, I don't know if you can see such level of patience and great speech in other courses and it's FREE. If you take this course please be aware that the method Savoir Relier takes you to a profound journey into your own life, you will revisited things inside yourself, how you are inside this world with another person, a group and the society. It follows introspection, relationships, reflection, experiences and senses, emotions. You need to be ready to open your mind and heart. | course please be aware that the | Method | Savoir Relier takes you to a | Positive | 0.82 | 5.0 |
| WQMNShxYEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Really great course! Really delves into the methodology behind effective teaching in a global classroom. | great course! Really delves into the | Method | behind effective teaching in a global | Positive | 0.85 | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good course to understand keys questions and methodology to manage each step of data analysis process | course to understand keys questions and | Method | to manage each step of data | Positive | 0.67 | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | For learn method and idea about data analysis ,it is good. | For learn | Method | and idea about data analysis , | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very useful discussion about the philosophy and method of data analysis. The associated text was useful, although somewhat basic. | useful discussion about the philosophy and | Method | of data analysis. The associated text | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | can't get past the outdated teaching | Method | of using the first 45 to | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | An extremely thorough overview on overall survey design methodology. | thorough overview on overall survey design | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | A good overview of surveys and data collection methods. The Total Survey Error framework is good, but its application isn't shown as strongly as it should be. Regardless this is a good primer for future material. | overview of surveys and data collection | Method | The Total Survey Error framework is | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Some of the evaluation methods just allow other people how doesn't do to much work to just pass... | Some of the evaluation | Method | just allow other people how doesn't | Neutral | 0.50 | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I liked everything about this course, from the presentation, to the method of teaching. It was great. | course, from the presentation, to the | Method | of teaching. It was great. | Positive | 0.97 | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I really enjoyed the course, but i found out that there is not enough information about such aspects as vitamins, minerals and what happens to them while cooking, what methods of cooking are healthier, which helps most to preserve most of the nutritions and why, etc... Nevertheless, I really appreciate your job and it was amazing feeling to spend some time with you because it was helpful and i enjoyed listening to your speech, voices and the culture overall. The knowledge will certainly be useful! Will suggest this course to my friends :) Kind regards from your russian student! | happens to them while cooking, what | Method | of cooking are healthier, which helps | Positive | 0.94 | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I should suggest my fellow Coursera students not to waste their money and time for this course. You'll learn a lot more than this course has to offer if you consult some websites with screenwriting tutorial blogs, read books and write on your own. I am a PhD student of theoretical film studies and and a fan of Coursera courses. I was eager to learn screenwriting as an interesting hands-on course. Well, it's project-based alright, but where's the real guidance?? This is a lazily designed course with poor content and almost zero guidance. The videos are very short and feels like a layman is trying to motivate you to write something, that's all. No methods explained other than some terminologies like bible, acts, outline being thrown at you. No examples, no comparisons, no detailed approaches. Lastly, scriptwriting has a significant difference with other humanities course. Being peer-reviewed doesn't help here -- a total novice can not effectively judge another newbie's work nor give them quality feedback. | to write something, that's all. No | Method | explained other than some terminologies like | Negative | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | Really enjoyed this course and I learned a lot. The content is interesting, engaging and informative. I now feel confident to get started on the graphic novel I've had in mind for some time, as well as starting a webcomic archive. I would recommend this course to anyone remotely interested in making comics. It's a great kick starter! Only reason I haven't given 5 stars is I was expecting it to be more compatible with digital methods of creating art. The course is structured to use hard copy printing and actual pens/pencils/inks, whereas I use a Wacom tablet and pen with Sketchbook Pro. So I had some fiddling around to do to access the course materials in a format that was useful to me. Also, the final week instructions seemed to be directed at a class putting their comics together in a compendium for the final print. I found it a bit confusing. | to be more compatible with digital | Method | of creating art. The course is | Positive | 0.68 | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | I would recommend this course to anyone who is looking to learn some high-level methods of assess a business' value, customer value and product value. The course also provided methods of measuring the bottom line contributions of previous, current and planned marketing campaigns; and approaches to A/B test these campaigns. Lastly, I would recommend purchasing the book that professor Raj Venkatesan co-wrote to gain a more complete understanding of Marketing Analytics. | is looking to learn some high-level | Method | of assess a business' value, customer | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | I would recommend this course to anyone who is looking to learn some high-level methods of assess a business' value, customer value and product value. The course also provided methods of measuring the bottom line contributions of previous, current and planned marketing campaigns; and approaches to A/B test these campaigns. Lastly, I would recommend purchasing the book that professor Raj Venkatesan co-wrote to gain a more complete understanding of Marketing Analytics. | product value. The course also provided | Method | of measuring the bottom line contributions | Negative | 0.92 | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Some of the evaluation methods just allow other people how doesn't do to much work to just pass... | Some of the evaluation | Method | just allow other people how doesn't | Neutral | 0.50 | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good, however instructions for the assignments are not complete. Often, instructions for the assignments that are required in the grading criteria are buried in the discussion forums, sometimes in multiple threads. And the method of grading is also only explained in the discussion forum. This can lead to the peer review grades being difficult to assign. The assignment pages should be updated to properly include ALL requirements and an explanation of how to grade the assignment. | sometimes in multiple threads. And the | Method | of grading is also only explained | Positive | 0.65 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice method to teach the basics of bootstrap frameworks. I recommend this course! | Very nice | Method | to teach the basics of bootstrap | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teaching method | Good teaching | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course. If you want to learn about Front-End Web UI Frameworks and Tools then this is the best source for you. The instructor is so awesome and his teaching methods are very comprehensive. | is so awesome and his teaching | Method | are very comprehensive. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is excellent. I like the "learn by doing" method adopted and during the course you built a good website. The last part dedicated to node.js, bower and npm is very helpful to understand how to use these web tools. | like the " learn by doing" | Method | adopted and during the course you | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | awsome guide covering various tools and methods for developing a modern website. | awsome guide covering various tools and | Method | for developing a modern website. | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Thank you professor Jogesh K Muppala. This is one of the best courses in the UI domain and any one interested must attend. The best part was the hands on teaching methodology and added to this the spice up was "What mistake I made" - learn and correct by validating other participants work... I enjoyed it..... :) Apologies for always been the late latif in submissions... | part was the hands on teaching | Method | and added to this the spice | Negative | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Teacher is very smart and he use a really nice methodology | and he use a really nice | Method | | Positive | 0.63 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Well balanced course with a lot of practical examples which help to understand the theory. I apply statistical inference methods myself, and nevertheless I've found new topics here. Thank you! | the theory. I apply statistical inference | Method | myself, and nevertheless I've found new | Positive | 0.66 | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Poor concepts exposition with a bad teaching method. | concepts exposition with a bad teaching | Method | | Negative | 0.99 | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Many videos lacked associated pdf slides so confusing to watch. Some topics on slides were not covered in videos. A supplemental video for those would be great even of optional. Brian Cato is a good presenter, however, more examples needed to be done showing how to work out various statistical problems both by traditional method and using R. | various statistical problems both by traditional | Method | and using R. | Positive | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Homework, lectures, and the quiz are completely out of sync. Bayes rule is introduced and appears in the homework but no where else. Things appear on the quiz that aren't in the home work or lecture. This was put together from scraps of another lecture, but in an incoherent fashion. When Caffo tells the viewer that they'll need to use other resources, he wasn't kidding. I dropped this the first time when I kept introducing things that completely had not been introduced, took another stats class, then came back and aced it. I don't mind accelerated learning or using other resources, but there's guide for which concepts are needed and where coverage for them can be found. This leaves little recourse but to know stats already, or go learn it before taking this course. Otherwise you don't know enough to even go find the pieces you need. Incidentally, the dude who does the lectures for Khan Academy does a fantastic job and the lectures are a joy to watch, though some people might prefer something that moves less slowly and carefully and perhaps they would prefer something that glosses over the fundamental concepts more. If that's the case, I can't say enough good things about Biostatistical Analysis by Zar but thoroughly, logically categorizing statistical methods with short, clear examples, references to the original research, and building up one concept after another in logical order. The chapters are short, but the first 16 or so should give you a good enough foundation to deal with about any intro stats class. As it is, Caffo's presentation needs some serious testing and remodeling, but there's no indication that it'll match what Khan Academy did regardless of how much work goes in. At best, it's a bitter pill you can swallow if you already know the concepts. | Zar but thoroughly, logically categorizing statistical | Method | with short, clear examples, references to | Neutral | 0.50 | 1.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | A good overview for budgeting and scheduling projects. The course focuses on the basics, but also does a good job of introducing more advanced methods for both financial and schedule management. | good job of introducing more advanced | Method | for both financial and schedule management. | Positive | 0.99 | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | I thought that this training was well put together! I look forward to additional training using this method. | forward to additional training using this | Method | | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Doing this course 'Budgeting and Scheduling projects' gives learners, a practical approach to Project management based on PMBOK methodology. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp and clear communication of ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | to Project management based on PMBOK | Method | Prof Margaret Meloni is a great | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Great methods for learning the basics of jazz improv! | Great | Method | for learning the basics of jazz | Positive | 0.69 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Really great course. I am currently working on the Jazz Guitar Professional Certificate program at Berklee online, and I will definitely take this class for a more detailed dive-in. Gary opened my mind on the keys skills to improvise, his chord-scale method explanation, and demonstration is simple to understand and provides a great way to continue practicing and developing the skills thought. | keys skills to improvise, his chord-scale | Method | explanation, and demonstration is simple to | Positive | 0.71 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | A tough but rewarding course! Especially if you are a beginner with respect to playing jazz, as I am, and if you are also a beginner with respect to music theory (which I am not, I have a master's degree in musicology), I guess it is more than tough. It's been more hard work than I expected, and I have spent more than 6 hours per week, but I also learned much more than I expected: a complete method for understanding jazz harmonization and developing solos. I know for sure that I shall benefit from this course for years to come. | more than I expected: a complete | Method | for understanding jazz harmonization and developing | Negative | 0.83 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Opened up a whole new world for me :) Gary Burton's topics method of explaining concepts and the course topics touched upon are just right :) Thank you Coursera ! | for me :) Gary Burton's topics | Method | of explaining concepts and the course | Positive | 0.76 | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Great approach to improvisation, great method for on line lessons | Great approach to improvisation, great | Method | for on line lessons | Positive | 0.79 | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | The material and the teaching method are absolutely amazing. Not just a course for algorithms, but a course on "how to teach a course right" .. very thankful to the instructors and facilitators. | The material and the teaching | Method | are absolutely amazing. Not just a | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty good course for Product Managers with respect to the review & metrics - with agile and scrum as the methodology | with agile and scrum as the | Method | | Positive | 0.65 | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I was actually looking for filmstudy courses but i must say i really enjoyed this one. I learned alot about memories, remembering and how our brain works. I have even found a new way for myself to faster learn scrips for films or remember things, by using the methods from this course! very well done. Just wish Wesleyan would give out the certificates for free. I think its useful to have, but in my case not necessary to purchase for my study career. Besides i'm like most young people very limited in my finances. I'd suggest to rather ask for donations and give out a more detailed certificate for the ones that donate but give out a standard certificate for all students. And thank you to all people involved for making this course, especially prof. Seamon, he explained the material very well! | or remember things, by using the | Method | from this course! very well done. | Positive | 0.99 | 5.0 |
| Zba0dJLREeSb9SIACzCJlg | Best course for music teachers and students as well. From this course one can learn basic to advanced things and proper method to play the instrument. The instructor also teaches the lessons interestingly in a new way, and shares many good different techniques to learn by heart the tunes. | basic to advanced things and proper | Method | to play the instrument. The instructor | Positive | 0.73 | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | It's such an amazing course, because the person who's talking has the appropriate knowledge to share and also has an excellent methodology in order to made clear what He knows. | share and also has an excellent | Method | in order to made clear what | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Bart method is just clear and fantastic, in my opinion. Great course! | Bart | Method | is just clear and fantastic, in | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a brilliant course to learn statistics from scratch. The instructors are too good and their teaching methods and examples are very lucid. A must visit course for everyone who wants to get their statistics correct | are too good and their teaching | Method | and examples are very lucid. A | Positive | 0.97 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | These concpets are explained in a clear and simple methods. Thats helpful to me. Thanks | explained in a clear and simple | Method | Thats helpful to me. Thanks | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | excellent work! the online office hours is a very good method! | office hours is a very good | Method | | Positive | 0.98 | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | The course is very well structured for a diverse range of learners. You could get a very deep knowledge and understanding through the readings (Greek tragedies, Herodotus, Thucydides etc) and the lectures, or a broad survey of the Ancient Greeks by just watching the videos. The professor also combines the narrative, the methods used to study those narratives and the limits to our knowledge in an erudite yet engaging manner. Definitely recommended as a top quality resource for anyone who wants to learn about Ancient Greece. | professor also combines the narrative, the | Method | used to study those narratives and | Positive | 0.91 | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | At first, I thought some views and methods could be ahead of conditions of my country. Because there is a significant difference in society behaviors and challenges. Whereas I understood more the lessons, I saw that there are brilliant and useful ideas and experiments for my city also. Some of them can be applicable and some of others of them are already doing. I'd like to thank to all teachers. | first, I thought some views and | Method | could be ahead of conditions of | Neutral | 0.50 | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Extremely helpful, with a broad range of topics covered. The case study and example based methodology for teaching topics makes it easier for building fundamental knowledge of the topic-even for beginners. | The case study and example based | Method | for teaching topics makes it easier | Positive | 0.81 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The teachers are great, I love this courses and the method for the students. Very Challenging, enjoy it!! A great experience | I love this courses and the | Method | for the students. Very Challenging, enjoy | Positive | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The staff of this course is really nice, that's the best part of it. Unfortunately, in my opinion this course is not intended for real beginners. From class one I struggled trying to understand what was going on. This may be because instead of just using a typical ide like eclipse or netbeans, they use bluejay, which works different than the rest of ides. In addition, programs used in the course are pretty confusing (If you know 0 Java). I learned most of the basic concepts (classes, methods) for whole week 1 from a single 15 minute video-course from youtube without all the struggling. As I mentioned this only applies if you are a total newbie, if you already know some Java I think you'll be fine. | most of the basic concepts (classes, | Method | for whole week 1 from a | Negative | 0.77 | 3.0 |